I agree Vista is extremely inefficient with memory usage, which in turn makes it slower, if you're using an older machine. I remember when I was using nearly 2gb of memory sitting idle. Which at the time 4gb was considered a ton of memory, so Vista was using approximately 50% of your system memory just to exist. Now, 7 uses nearly the same amount of memory as Vista, but PC's are being built with more memory because it's super cheap now. I have 12gb in my PC.Jmustang1968 wrote:While some bugs and security issues were patched, it is still inefficient and slower.Frag Mortuus wrote:I'm going to side with Dave. Vista was a horrible mess at launch, but has since been patched and updated to removed the errors and stabilize it. I ran Vista for years and had absolutely no problems out of it. I only upgraded to 7 because I got a free Professional code back in college as part of the Computer Science program.
Windows 8 is actually a great OS with the exception of the User Interface. I hate the Metro UI. It is probably great for tablets and for Surface, but for a desktop or laptop without a touch screen, it is completely counter intuitive. However, it is stable and has so little overhead that it runs better than any OS, not by much, but it is a small OS.
I never really thought it was all that slow in real world use though. I didn't think my PC was any slower running Vista than it was when I was using XP. Perhaps marginally slower, but not extremely so.


