PC build thread
- samsonlonghair
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5188
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
- Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border
Re: PC build thread
You know what keeps me out of the SSD market? The inherently finite number of writes. Has this problem been alleviated yet?
Re: PC build thread
The argument could be made that the write limit of current SSDs will carry most drives out further than the mechanical components of traditional hard drives are likely to last.samsonlonghair wrote:You know what keeps me out of the SSD market? The inherently finite number of writes. Has this problem been alleviated yet?
Re: PC build thread
I think the projected MTBF on a lot of mechanical HDDs (at least ones that provide them) would suggest they're expected to last longer...but at the same time, I doubt you'd find many IT offices without stacks of failed HDDs in them.
SSDs, as I understand, largely make this less and less of an issue as they get larger. Each cell has limited write cycles, so they rotate through them (part of why you want to keep a decent amount of free space on one, also for best performance).
Even the less-durable memory in the Samsung EVO series (and others now) should last longer than most people would be relying on the drive. Anandtech did some math on it when the 840 EVO came out, since people were concerned. Under normal, even heavy-ish use, the projected life based on write cycles was easily long enough for most people (15+ years for a 250GB drive, and that's under constant use). That's for the less-durable type of NAND to boot.
It's not really any different than anything else using flash memory. Your memory cards, built-in storage on a Wii/Wii U, cell phones and tablets, and so on all rely on flash memory that won't last forever. At least an SSD in your PC is easily replaceable, if you happen to still be using it in a decade or three.
SSDs, as I understand, largely make this less and less of an issue as they get larger. Each cell has limited write cycles, so they rotate through them (part of why you want to keep a decent amount of free space on one, also for best performance).
Even the less-durable memory in the Samsung EVO series (and others now) should last longer than most people would be relying on the drive. Anandtech did some math on it when the 840 EVO came out, since people were concerned. Under normal, even heavy-ish use, the projected life based on write cycles was easily long enough for most people (15+ years for a 250GB drive, and that's under constant use). That's for the less-durable type of NAND to boot.
It's not really any different than anything else using flash memory. Your memory cards, built-in storage on a Wii/Wii U, cell phones and tablets, and so on all rely on flash memory that won't last forever. At least an SSD in your PC is easily replaceable, if you happen to still be using it in a decade or three.
Re: PC build thread
Talking about what it takes to kill an SSD...
Here's the results of an 18 month experiment to do just that with consumer level drives.
http://techreport.com/review/27909/the- ... e-all-dead
Here's the results of an 18 month experiment to do just that with consumer level drives.
http://techreport.com/review/27909/the- ... e-all-dead
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: PC build thread
That was pretty interesting. I just read all of the installments.marurun wrote:Talking about what it takes to kill an SSD...
Here's the results of an 18 month experiment to do just that with consumer level drives.
http://techreport.com/review/27909/the- ... e-all-dead
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
Re: PC build thread
I've been upgrading a bit.
Now my specs are:
i7-4790k
GTX 980
16 GB RAM

Now my specs are:
i7-4790k
GTX 980
16 GB RAM
- noiseredux
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 38148
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: PC build thread
nice dood!ZenErik wrote:I've been upgrading a bit.
Now my specs are:
i7-4790k
GTX 980
16 GB RAM
I'm planning a few upgrades too, but probably not until around May or so. I've done quite a few in recent months - the GTX 970, ASRock Z97, i5 4690k, Samsung EVO 850... I want to jump my 8GB to 16 as well.
I'm also planning a few upgrades for my wife, but I don't want to start those until I get her a nice new case first.
Re: PC build thread
That's a good read. I actually feel better about using a SSD now.Hobie-wan wrote:That was pretty interesting. I just read all of the installments.marurun wrote:Talking about what it takes to kill an SSD...
Here's the results of an 18 month experiment to do just that with consumer level drives.
http://techreport.com/review/27909/the- ... e-all-dead
-
fastbilly1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13775
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm
Re: PC build thread
I am probably going to do an SSD upgrade this year, and upgrade the whole box next year. Trying to get a decade off my gaming PC.
Edit:
Thanks to Noise an SSD is in the mail to me. I will get that decade out of this machine, and be able to make a beast of one next year.
Edit:
Thanks to Noise an SSD is in the mail to me. I will get that decade out of this machine, and be able to make a beast of one next year.
Re: PC build thread
Who is doing SSD only and who is doing SSD + traditional HD?
