Page 74 of 168

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:27 pm
by Phades
My PS4 is pretty loud too. It's not terrible, but it's definitely noticeable. My Xbox One is silent, probably because of how huge that fan inside it is. There are some advantages to being massive :)

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:33 pm
by dsheinem
Phades wrote: There are some advantages to being massive :)


michaelscott.gif

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:45 pm
by MrPopo
Phades wrote:My PS4 is pretty loud too. It's not terrible, but it's definitely noticeable. My Xbox One is silent, probably because of how huge that fan inside it is. There are some advantages to being massive :)

I'm still trying to figure out why the Xbox One is larger than the PS4 and still needs an external brick.

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:47 pm
by ZenErik
Because it's quiet? :mrgreen:

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:31 pm
by Reprise
Because it's Microsoft.

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:55 pm
by RCBH928
MrPopo wrote:
Phades wrote:My PS4 is pretty loud too. It's not terrible, but it's definitely noticeable. My Xbox One is silent, probably because of how huge that fan inside it is. There are some advantages to being massive :)

I'm still trying to figure out why the Xbox One is larger than the PS4 and still needs an external brick.


actually, I am still wondering how come the slim ps3 still larger than ps4 , even though its 7 year old technology.

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:03 pm
by Phades
MrPopo wrote:
Phades wrote:My PS4 is pretty loud too. It's not terrible, but it's definitely noticeable. My Xbox One is silent, probably because of how huge that fan inside it is. There are some advantages to being massive :)

I'm still trying to figure out why the Xbox One is larger than the PS4 and still needs an external brick.


I think it's because of how it is being marketed and designed to be used. The Xbox One is being pushed as this high-end all-in-one AV device. It is meant to sit next to your receiver and control your living room. It seems like they were going for more of a receiver look and less of a game console look.

They also designed it to constantly be on. Between TV, gaming, working out, etc. it is expected to see some heavy use. Most people aren't marathon gamers, but they do watch a ton of TV. With the RROD debacle, Microsoft was probably paranoid about heat build up.

I personally couldn't care less about the power brick. Once I plug it in and slide it behind my entertainment center, I won't see it again for years (hopefully).

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:11 pm
by Aramonde
Idk if i've posted this before, but i'll post again if i did.

The PS4 costs $381 to produce

http://www.destructoid.com/the-ps4-costs-381-to-produce-according-to-experts-266052.phtml

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:14 pm
by Retrogamer0001
Aramonde wrote:Idk if i've posted this before, but i'll post again if i did.

The PS4 costs $381 to produce

http://www.destructoid.com/the-ps4-costs-381-to-produce-according-to-experts-266052.phtml


Well, so what? Most game companies sell their consoles at a loss or near-loss and then recoup the costs with software, online services, and accessories. Look at the PS2 and PS3, same deal.

Re: The PS4 thread

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:28 pm
by isiolia
Retrogamer0001 wrote:
Aramonde wrote:Idk if i've posted this before, but i'll post again if i did.

The PS4 costs $381 to produce

http://www.destructoid.com/the-ps4-costs-381-to-produce-according-to-experts-266052.phtml


Well, so what? Most game companies sell their consoles at a loss or near-loss and then recoup the costs with software, online services, and accessories. Look at the PS2 and PS3, same deal.


Seems more like the point is the opposite. Sony isn't losing much money per PS4 compared to the hundreds per PS3 at launch.