My most unpopular opinion is that not only are retro games worth playing but they are better than the new games being released today.
So I'm an Arcade games player at heart.
Started gaming in the 80s when I had first played some awesome Arcade's back in the 80s.
Then wanted the same experience at home.
Which was fulfilled to various degrees such as Street Fighter 2 at home Snes edition not Arcade perfect but still a great conversation.
My primary reason for old games being better than modern games.
Is that they were designed to be replayable.
Today's games are designed to be long.
Put into context a long game in the 90s was Final Fantasy 7 that came on 4 discs and lasted around 32hours to beat according to Google.
Today you get much longer games that even if I manage to play them the whole way through I don't see myself going back to them.
When it comes to length is mostly padding.
So when it comes to retro games they don't take long to beat in comparison to modern games and yet people like myself have been replaying them for years now.
Also all of the latest games in my favourite genre of fighting games are all the worst versions in the franchise.
Street Fighter + Tekken 8 for example.
While the mechanics are arguably better.
They are no longer follow the Arcade template that I loved about them.
The last great Tekken game for single player was Tekken 5.
It has character intros and endings as rewards and you had to play and gain experience as different fighters to see the endings.
Tekken 6 is where it became bad with that lame ass scenario mode that has awkward controls for movement.
There has been a Tekken force mode in the home games since Tekken 3 but it wasn't the main game Mode untill Tekken 6.
Street Fighter V famously came with no Arcade mode and later added a Token Arcade mode so it would sell.
I know I'm at odds with the wider FGC but this is my unpopular opinion
