Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by dsheinem »

noiseredux wrote: I never ran into this either. Dave, you and I played on PC. Luke played on 360. MAYBE the save system was different? (Seems strange if it was, but...)
I played on PS3. About to play the DLC on the PC, when I find the time.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by dsheinem »

Retrogamer0001 wrote:
It's not that "archaic," it is a checkpoint system. Lots of games still use them, and I still hold that it is a deliberate design choice to NOT allow the player to save when they want. It may be inconvenient, but given that they had previously used a more "contemporary" save system in the earlier games you have to see this as a choice to up the difficulty of the game.
Have you played this game? I ask because the checkpoints do not save the game, only level exits and extrances do (or so it seems). I played for several hours at one point, hitting multiple checkpoints only to have to redo all that work after shutting off my system to take a break. Why? Ask the devs, because I sure as hell don't know.
Hmm, I don't recall that being my experience to be honest. The game would tell you/prompt you with when it last autosaved before you exited, and if the time was too far back I would keep playing a bit until I saw a new autosave. I played it right at launch…and on PS3….was it different later or on another platform?
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by isiolia »

Retrogamer0001 wrote: Have you played this game? I ask because the checkpoints do not save the game, only level exits and extrances do (or so it seems). I played for several hours at one point, hitting multiple checkpoints only to have to redo all that work after shutting off my system to take a break. Why? Ask the devs, because I sure as hell don't know.
It's how Halo seems to do things too. I turned off Anniversary figuring that, hey, I hit a checkpoint, I should start back there. Nope. When I went back the next day, it bumped me back by about an hour, to the last chapter marker. It -will- save at the last checkpoint, but only if you use the "save and quit" option.

I found the checkpointing in those games a little spotty in general, but, there's kind of an art to it anyway, and it did get better as the series progressed.

So it might partly be something that tends to fly on consoles, but there's a lower tolerance for on PC.
User avatar
Retrogamer0001
Next-Gen
Posts: 1665
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:56 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by Retrogamer0001 »

dsheinem wrote:
Retrogamer0001 wrote:
It's not that "archaic," it is a checkpoint system. Lots of games still use them, and I still hold that it is a deliberate design choice to NOT allow the player to save when they want. It may be inconvenient, but given that they had previously used a more "contemporary" save system in the earlier games you have to see this as a choice to up the difficulty of the game.
Have you played this game? I ask because the checkpoints do not save the game, only level exits and extrances do (or so it seems). I played for several hours at one point, hitting multiple checkpoints only to have to redo all that work after shutting off my system to take a break. Why? Ask the devs, because I sure as hell don't know.
Hmm, I don't recall that being my experience to be honest. The game would tell you/prompt you with when it last autosaved before you exited, and if the time was too far back I would keep playing a bit until I saw a new autosave. I played it right at launch…and on PS3….was it different later or on another platform?
I played it on 360 myself, and this exact situation happened to me multiple times. I won't even try to pretend that I understand it, because I don't. You can only go back and trudge through the same levels so many times before you start to lose your patience for bullshit, so the game sits on my shelf, ignored.
Image

The game room - > http://racketboy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=45478

"We're on an express elevator to hell - goin' down!"
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
Posts: 12410
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by prfsnl_gmr »

Luke wrote:Save states DO make the game easier.
I agree. In many cases, however, I think that including save points in some NES games would have made them vastly more enjoyable. (I think a lot more people would have appreciated and enjoyed the staggering variety in Battletoads' level design if the game had included a save or password feature.)
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by Luke »

dunpeal2064 wrote:Save stating in a lot of those older NES games is akin to cheating.

I say this because, if you beat the game (lets say, Ninja Gaiden 3) with save states, you are most likely incapable of clearing the game.

You are using save states to adjust the difficulty. The deisgn choice is the same, but in reverse.
Nail on the head.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by dsheinem »

So I just wrapped up the first episode of the DLC (Burial at Sea). Good stuff, though at the end of it I am still a bit unsure exactly what is going on. That said, playing in the places you do is very cool and the atmosphere/design of the world is still second to none in the genre.

I was also surprised how long it took to get to the combat sections, and ultimately I felt like I was doing a lot more scrounging for health and ammo than I remember from the campaign.

Anyway, I know noise and Stark were planning to play this weekend too, so i thought I'd chime in with some thoughts. Have other folks spent much time with the DLC? Is the 2nd Episode about as long as the first?
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by MrPopo »

The second does more work explaining what happened in the first. It's about the same length but it's more of a gameplay change; it plays more like Thief than a guns blazing shooter.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by dsheinem »

MrPopo wrote:The second does more work explaining what happened in the first. It's about the same length but it's more of a gameplay change; it plays more like Thief than a guns blazing shooter.
Sweet! Hopefully I'll get to it today.
User avatar
marurun
Moderator
Posts: 12406
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Always hated FPS games, but Bioshock Infinite.....

Post by marurun »

I suggest giving Borderlands a try. Sure, it's story-light, but it gives you a great deal of open space to explore and lots of side-missions you don't have to take. It isn't atmospheric in a serious sense, but it is something of a playground.

Then again, I did LOVE Deus Ex: Human Revolution because of how many different play styles it supported.
Post Reply