More power to you. Perhaps one of many reasons the Mass Effect games did so well was that the depictions of characters and their sexuality did not patronize either sex of player. True, asari, but their entire culture was based on their sexual behavior, so for them to be dressed modestly would've just been hilarious. I think the first two games provide a good example of sex in a game being depicted in a way that was not gratuitous and insulting. I did not play the third because of what it takes to buy it.Menegrothx wrote:I'm sure this has been already mentioned, but to many male gamers characters like that feel insulting, it's like the game expects us to be so primitive and simple minded that we can overlook everything else in a bad movie/anime/game as long as there are good looking women to stare at. (&cont.)SpiderFem wrote: Oh, and a side note on that. As long as Lara Croft, Lineage II, and every other female-eyecandy-only game exists, no male gamer will be able to complain about females liking bishonen eye candy and "weak" sensitive males without some level of hypocrisy.
I will add, on the topic of JRPGs, that I don't play them because I don't consider most to be roleplaying. The characters are laid out for you and you usually have no real effect on their personalities and arcs, just on superficial events. I mentioned them because I do like pretty male faces here and there, including in games, and because it was earlier suggested that this was the reason for females choosing to play them.
Is that mandatory? Certainly not. Of my two current companions in Skyrim, one is a modded handsome Imperial and one is Ahtar. The only reason I haven't uninstalled Fallout 3 yet is because I miss Charon and Fawkes, and I keep thinking I'll go back and see them again. So if a character is well written and their story is compelling, I don't care particularly if they're handsome, pretty, or ugly. But if the game is going to be shallow and beat-'em-up oriented? Of course I want to see parity in the fan service.

