AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
Never watched the BBC?
AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
Nope.Hatta wrote:Never watched the BBC?AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
Britain's news has a little more interest in the rest of the world because they used to own most of it. That's not true of us, so we have less interest in what goes on in India or Palestine. Besides, the UK is so small not much newsworthy stuff happens there I would imagine.Hatta wrote:AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
Never watched the BBC?
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Very good point.Limewater wrote:I think it's also worth mentioning that the United States is a large country with a large population. If you live in Europe and you're getting news from 2000 miles away, you're almost certainly getting news about another country. If you live in the United States and you're getting news from 2000 miles away, there's a very good chance you're still talking about a place within the states.AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
I'm not a big fan of American news reporting, but I don't really know enough about the news anywhere else to make any sort of informed comparison.
You've clearly never watched news from Mexico. Now that's infotainment!martin31406 wrote:The map is also a reflection of the U.S. media. Watch any U.S. news program. Their news is, for the most part, obsessed with the U.S. and the U.S. alone. When they cover nations outside the U.S., it's usually because those nations affect the U.S. in a particular way. With the Middle East, you learn about terrorists and oil. With Columbia, you learn about the drug trade. With the nations in Africa you learn about poverty, violence and HIV. It's perhaps the least informative news in the western world.General_Norris wrote:I see what you did thereMrPopo wrote:I think it's criminal [...] Carmen Sandiago
That's not fair. Lots of stuff happens. The only thing we don't have is politically influenced televised news shows. Talk about 'unbiased media'.BoringSupreez wrote:Besides, the UK is so small not much newsworthy stuff happens there I would imagine.
I do from time to time...or I should say that I read the articles on their website. I don't know of any American news sites that break it down regionally the same way they do, though I wish they would go a little further and break it down by country. If they do, I've never found a means for accessing it.Hatta wrote:AppleQueso wrote: I've always assumed that all news was handled this way. I've never imagined that say, Japan's news reports much on things outside of Japan unless it actually affects Japan.
Never watched the BBC?

So very true. I can't stand watching U.S. news cause it usually always ends up being political and bleh.... I could care a whole lot less about our crappy political "system". This is why I watch BBC World News every chance I can, they expose you to about 5x more world than you get on CBS / NBC / ABC. That being said, Idk why people are so bad at Geography. Look at a map every once in a while.martin31406 wrote:Watch any U.S. news program. Their news is, for the most part, obsessed with the U.S. and the U.S. alone.