o.pwuaioc wrote:If one person really likes it, it does not objectively suck, but it doesn't subjectively suck for them.
Quality, by definition, is intrinsic hence it cannot be subjective even if our means to determine such quality are inprecise.
Someone liking a certain work of art doesn't mean it's of a bigger quality, just that the work in question fits the person tastes and isn't bothered by it's downsides. And there's nothing wrong with that! But how much someone likes depends on the person, it's extrinsic, it depends on the person.
Some works are great but have little audience while others are pretty bad but loved by many.
Reviews shouldn't be aggregated, as they are argumentative, just being a more popular argument doesn't make it better. Rather, a review invalidates other so adding the scores is not reasonable.