Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Gaming on the Playstation and Xbox Platforms
Hatta
Next-Gen
Posts: 4030
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:33 pm

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by Hatta »

Concerning "begs the question", there's a difference between the evolution of language, and people misapplying technical terms. Just because my GF's mom calls her monitor a "computer" and her tower a "hard drive", and I understand what that means doesn't make it correct. Similarly, because someone uses "begs the question" to mean "raise the question" and people understand it, doesn't make it correct.

Oh, and this thread:
Image
We are prepared to live in the plain and die in the plain!
AppleQueso

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by AppleQueso »

There is probably a formula for the length of a racketboy thread vs how likely it is to have derailed.

I remember that Mosques thread that got derailed like 5 different times into various subjects.
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by Niode »

pepharytheworm wrote:
Niode wrote:No it's just wrong. I know plenty of people from the states and it annoys them too. Plus dsheinem backs me up on it. I think I'd rather take his word over yours. No offence. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the evolution of language, but this just does not mean what people think it means. Same with 'irregardless' that one actually makes me shudder when I hear it.
How about instead of taking anyones "word for it" (another idiom by the way) you do some independent research from many sources. I will agree that there is debate on the usage of the phrase, but from everything I read "could care less" is used more in the US than "couldn't care less".

But the whole point of my remark was pretty much just jumping on you for using how enderfall wrote his thoughts against him and not their intent, which I am sure you plainly understood. Its a cheap method of attack, something lawyers do to twist words around ( another idiom, man we use a lot not even thinking about them). I know you're above that we have had discussions before.
Nah I corrected him for being wrong regarding the openness of mobile devices. Then corrected him again for not understanding what a jailbreak actually is. He mistakenly thought that a jailbreak on a phone was to allow network interoperability. The jailbreak itself allows the running of unsigned code on the device. This is what makes network interoperability possible, not the jailbreak itself.

The 'couldn't care less' thing was just a tangent. Not a way of 'attacking' the guy. I didn't attack the guy at all.
How about instead of taking anyones "word for it" (another idiom by the way) you do some independent research from many sources. I will agree that there is debate on the usage of the phrase, but from everything I read "could care less" is used more in the US than "couldn't care less".
Thank you for the information on what an idiom is. I am clearly not smart enough to know what one is. Thank you. I don't know how the hell I passed my degrees without knowing that one. Thanks again.

To me it just doesn't make sense. Perhaps if you were to say it to my face I wouldn't notice it. My brain would have just filled in the gap and I would have grasped the tone anyway had it not. On paper it looks stupid. It completely contradicts the statement before it. A quick google and the vast majority of hits agree with me. So I think I'm going to continue correcting people for now. I know that's not proper research technique (I should know) but I haven't got time or interest to write a fucking thesis about this shit on an internet forum.


Regarding derails. I shall create Niode's law: As a Racketboy.com forum discussion grows longer the probability of the thread staying on topic is 0.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by pepharytheworm »

Hatta wrote:Oh, and this thread:
Image
Mission accomplished :wink:
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by Ack »

Image
Image
Curlypaul
Next-Gen
Posts: 1693
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:25 pm
Location: UK - Dudley

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by Curlypaul »

AppleQueso wrote:
- "Literally" means actually. Stop using it for stuff that didn't actually happen.
This is one of my pet peeves. My head literally explodes when I someone uses that word wrong.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

This is actually one of my pet hates too, especially in that particular cranium splattering context.
User avatar
flamepanther
Next-Gen
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:40 pm

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by flamepanther »

pepharytheworm wrote:How about instead of taking anyones "word for it" (another idiom by the way) you do some independent research from many sources.
Unlike "I could care less," "take my word for it" has the same meaning literally as it does idiomatically: "accept (take)what I am saying (my word) as fact on this subject."
I will agree that there is debate on the usage of the phrase, but from everything I read "could care less" is used more in the US than "couldn't care less".
There are many things about which people are wrong more often than they are right. Common mistakes and misconceptions do not become correct merely by virtue of frequency.
Image
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by pepharytheworm »

flamepanther wrote:There are many things about which people are wrong more often than they are right. Common mistakes and misconceptions do not become correct merely by virtue of frequency.
I am really sure everyone uses "Artificial" the correct way too and it never changed its meaning.

Awful is another great example of words changing because of use. "full of awe" somehow turned into something that is not.

Here are more great examples that defy logic.

Manufacture - Use to mean made by hand.

Brave - once was meant to describe cowards or depraved

Nice - ignorant

Counterfeit - perfect copy
Last edited by pepharytheworm on Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by GSZX1337 »

Ack wrote:Image
I think that's grammatically incorrect. ;)
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
User avatar
jfrost
Next-Gen
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Geohot: guilty or not guilty?

Post by jfrost »

AppleQueso wrote:
- "Literally" means actually. Stop using it for stuff that didn't actually happen.
This is one of my pet peeves. My head literally explodes when I someone uses that word wrong.
Ironically, most people use the world "literally" figuratively.
Post Reply