racketboy.com

Pulsar_t wrote:That Kardashian slut is about to recruit 20 million idiots into fighting the civil war in Syria. Why? Because suddenly she found out she's of Armenian origin or something. Bitch, spare a thought for the other 150'000 dead why don't you?

First, please don't dispense with the insults. Second, on whose side?

Pulsar_t wrote:That Kardashian slut is about to recruit 20 million idiots into fighting the civil war in Syria. Why? Because suddenly she found out she's of Armenian origin or something. Bitch, spare a thought for the other 150'000 dead why don't you?

20 million?! How amazing would it be if a Kardashian made it into the history books by determining the outcome of a conflict like this? For generations, Syrian children would read about Kim Kardashian in their history textbooks.

She should lead the charge herself in a pink M1 Abrams while Chloe Kardashian drops smart bombs onto Assad controlled territory. Freedom!

Why is she just now discovering her ethnicity?

SirGawain wrote:Why is she just now discovering her ethnicity?

Must have come to her whilst she was staring at her enlarged butt in the mirror. Such a dweeb fails at the process of thinking, instead her existence as a glamourised meatbag for the millions of idiots to drool over is what empowers her to pollute the world with her crap.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01wgcdx

This BBC programme tackles this hashtag debacle from various perspectives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vJg03DZiEA In other news, it's been 20 years since the genocide in Rwanda. What a colossal fuckup that was.

So Russia has no intentions of leaving Crimea?

Adam wrote:Several Ukrainian cities have fallen to the Russian sympathisers. They've declared their independence from Kiev and are calling for Russian intervention.

The Russian army is preparing for an invasion of the Ukrainian mainland. The Ukrainian army has vowed to fight back this time to defend their homeland.

They have seized the government buildings. Basically the police doesn't want to push them back violently, probably because they don't want to become as bad as their previous government, or putin, and they are waiting for them to leave.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26919928

Besides there isn't as big a Russian population in those cities as in Crimea (Russian and Russian speaking are 2 different things, by the way.)

Similar topic about Finland, but this is getting as confusing as fuck

http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2014/04/finland-and-russia

I call bull. Heightened military activity ≠ war.. Doesn't make it any less distressing though. I'd like to think that Scandinavia generally has nailed down the formula for balanced social welfare and growth for at least a few more generations ahead. To have to allocate more to the military budget in face of Russian harassment is not very productive to the general population. Shame on Mr. Putin

Pulsar_t wrote:I call bull. Heightened military activity ≠ war.. Doesn't make it any less distressing though. I'd like to think that Scandinavia generally has nailed down the formula for balanced social welfare and growth for at least a few more generations ahead. To have to allocate more to the military budget in face of Russian harassment is not very productive to the general population. Shame on Mr. Putin

Not bull. Putin's chief economic adviser from 2000 to 2005, Andrej Illarionov, says Putin is ultimately after Finland.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vladimir-putin-wants-to-regain-finland-for-russia-adviser-says-9224273.html