Wii-U thoughts so far

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii

Wii-U

I'm in for one
120
43%
Maybe later
96
35%
Not interested
45
16%
Undecided
16
6%
 
Total votes: 277

User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZeroAX »

That last part in intriguing. I mean it was obvious that the "Wii generation" had abandoned console gaming for ios games, yet nintendo gave their console such a silly name to try and tap into the popularity of its previous console. I too think that it will be easier for Nintendo to get hardcore gamers to buy the Wii U than former Wii only gamers. It'd be sad to see Nintendo do so badly again :(
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
BurningDoom
Next-Gen
Posts: 5953
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:14 am

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by BurningDoom »

dsheinem wrote:
BurningDoom wrote:The whole point of this is that someone said that Wii U ports will be crappy.

BurningDoom wrote: I'm not buying that it's gonna have crappy ports. Sounds like unsubstantiated Nintendo hating to me.
BurningDoom wrote:How about I turn this around, then. Do you guys have anything to show me to support that it's gonna have crappy ports?
Ok, you keep shifting around your major claim (before it was about the enthusiasm about graphics in media coverage and now it is about the actual quality of the ports) but I am trying to keep up.

A couple of things here.

1) I expect graphics in Wii U ports of existing gen games should/could be close to if not (in some cases) better than their PS3/360 counterparts. I don't doubt that the hardware is likely "there" to do so. HOWEVER, the Wii had potential to produce "best ports" of PS2/Xbox games but often didn't due to the inclusion of waggle controls (e.g. Metal Slug Anthology, Okami) or B-teams working on porting engines and producing uglier graphics on the Wii. That said, graphically there are bright spots like Silent Hill Shattered Memories or RE4, both of which look better on Wii.

2) Again, following the similarity positioned Wii, I expect the Wii U to get watered down ports of PS4/Xbox 720 games. There's a long history of that this generation. It almost certainly won't have the specs to keep up, and for the majority of its life it will likely be the ugliest current console on the market.

3) Several early reports on ports of PS3/360 games are not looking good. Some games are reaching parity, others are looking worse. Developers are saying that the Wii U is "maybe even better" than the 360/PS3. I've yet to see many ANY reports talking about how much BETTER a Wii U port of a current gen game looks. See:

http://kotaku.com/5943073/batman-arkham ... the-wii-u-

http://www.vg247.com/2012/08/17/wii-u-g ... says-sumo/

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012- ... 0-versions

4) The quality of graphics in ports have zero bearing on whether I would want to purchase a Wii U.
Then we're in agreement, it's not gonna have crappy ports of existing games. And that was my point to begin with. I wasn't even replying to you to begin with, I was replying to Zing. The better graphics comment was in there to support that. Then you jumped in and wanted me to prove it.

Here's the whole post:
You realize that Nintendo is promising better graphics than any other console on the market, right? So watered-down isn't quite the right word here. I think you're looking for "enhanced" port. Like many PS1 ports to the Dreamcast.
While you just quoted the highlighted section and focused on it. My main point never got jumbled at all, it was you that focused on one section of my post rather than my main point.

And to compare to 720 and PS4 ports at this point is kind of silly. We don't have the slightest idea what they're gonna be like or when they're even coming.
Game Trade/Want List:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=28206

Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by MrPopo »

noiseredux wrote:this is how I see it as well. A few pages back Dave posed a question about if there were Wii games that looked like they couldn't run (visually) on PS2/GCN/Xb and I found that intriguing.
There is one game I can think of off the top of my head. Muramasa would not run on the PS2 and be the same game. Muramasa has extremely fluid action. It's predecessor, Odin Sphere, gets very choppy when you start to have a lot on the screen, which Muramasa does not suffer from.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
ZenErik
Next-Gen
Posts: 4185
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:15 am
Location: Boston

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZenErik »

MrPopo wrote:
noiseredux wrote:this is how I see it as well. A few pages back Dave posed a question about if there were Wii games that looked like they couldn't run (visually) on PS2/GCN/Xb and I found that intriguing.
There is one game I can think of off the top of my head. Muramasa would not run on the PS2 and be the same game. Muramasa has extremely fluid action. It's predecessor, Odin Sphere, gets very choppy when you start to have a lot on the screen, which Muramasa does not suffer from.
But would it have run on the GCN or Xbox well? The PS2 was seemingly the least capable of the three, but I still love it.

Speaking of Muramasa. I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE VITA PORT. YES! :D
My B/S/T thread! :)
Switch ID: ??? ||| PSN ID: ZenErik (PS4) ||| Steam: Erikdayo
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by MrPopo »

ZenErik wrote:
MrPopo wrote:
noiseredux wrote:this is how I see it as well. A few pages back Dave posed a question about if there were Wii games that looked like they couldn't run (visually) on PS2/GCN/Xb and I found that intriguing.
There is one game I can think of off the top of my head. Muramasa would not run on the PS2 and be the same game. Muramasa has extremely fluid action. It's predecessor, Odin Sphere, gets very choppy when you start to have a lot on the screen, which Muramasa does not suffer from.
But would it have run on the GCN or Xbox well? The PS2 was seemingly the least capable of the three, but I still love it.

Speaking of Muramasa. I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE VITA PORT. YES! :D
No idea. It seems like the kind of thing that you'd need to dig deep into the technical specifications of the game (simultaneous moving sprites, image size, etc) and you could maybe extrapolate from there based upon the specs of the ox box and the GC. But you'd probably be better off just ripping the graphics out of the Wii disc and try to make a playable demo of a screen on each console.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZeroAX »

I don't think the gamecube would have been able to run Super Mario Galaxy.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
Reprise
Next-Gen
Posts: 4822
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:27 am
Location: Earth

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Reprise »

I just pre-ordered the ZombieU deluxe package. Looking forward to 30 November :)

I don't really know what to make of the Wii-U yet, but I'm just hoping on some awesome first party titles as per Nintendo's usual. Maybe they'll be a few surprises too, like when the first Metroid Prime blew me away on the Gamecube.
Own: Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, Playstation 1, Playstation 2, Playstation 3, Playstation 4, Playstation 5, PS Vita, Super Nintendo, Nintendo 64, Gamecube, Wii U, Game Boy Advance, DS, 3DS, Switch, Switch 2, Xbox, Xbox 360
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by dsheinem »

BurningDoom wrote: Then we're in agreement, it's not gonna have crappy ports of existing games.
No we aren't. I said that port parity or improvement is yet an unknown. If anything, according to the coverage thus far, there's much to indicate that seeing inferior ports of PS3/360 games farmed out to third parties or B-list crews are a distinct possibility. It certainly happened on the Wii's ports of PS2/Xbox games with some frequency.
Burning Doom wrote:While you just quoted the highlighted section and focused on it. My main point never got jumbled at all, it was you that focused on one section of my post rather than my main point.
You made several points, including at least one about what press coverage of the Wii U signaled about graphics: that they were superior and would produce the nicest looking ports. That remains unsubstantiated.
Burning Doom wrote:And to compare to 720 and PS4 ports at this point is kind of silly. We don't have the slightest idea what they're gonna be like or when they're even coming.
We know they are in development and that all rumored specs have been leaps beyond the Wii U's official steps. All of this is silly, frankly, so I don't see the 720/PS4 port discussion as any more inane than what you're floating.


I think that Nintendo's long history of poorly selling third party games will continue to hurt it. To that point, the Wii probably did more to scare away development of "hardcore" projects for a Nintendo console than the Wii U will do to entice them. It's all about the bottom dollar, and there's not a lot of historical incentive for EA, Activision, Ubisoft, etc. to develop huge and expensive projects for the Wii U. Much cheaper and better to try and port existing stuff with some "enhancement" (maybe graphics, maybe control, etc.) or downgrade/port PS4/720 games. In any case, top studio talent likely won't be spending an inordinate amount of time on the Nintendo version, as has long been the case now...
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZeroAX »

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012- ... se-and-out

:shock: :shock: :shock:

.....wow?

This seems big to me, at least in terms of indie content. And who knows, perhaps the indies will be willing to use the gamepad in a much more interesting way than the big studios.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by MrPopo »

Here's hoping we could get a port of MechWarrior Tactics to the Wii U, with a large single player campaign (maybe the campaign for Wolcott and Luthien in the Clan Invasion) and utilizing two gamepads for the asymmetric turns and show the results on the big screen.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Post Reply