Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else

Which Pokemon Generation is best?

1st( Red, Blue, Yellow, Green)
3
50%
2nd(Gold, Silver, Crystal)
1
17%
3rd(Ruby, Saphire, Emerald)
2
33%
4th(Diamond, Pearl, Platinum)
0
No votes
5(Black, Black2, White, White 2))
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
pankakes123
64-bit
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by pankakes123 »

Just to end this little debacle regarding a lack of creativity in designing Pokemon, both Gen 1 and Gen 5 have some great Pokemon and some flat out uninspired Pokemon.

Gen 1 Uninspired Pokemon:
Image

Image

Image

Image
Gen 1 Awesome Pokemon:
Image

Image

Image

Image
Gen 5 Uninspired Pokemon:
Image

Image

Image

Image
Gen 5 Awesome Pokemon:
Image

Image

Image

Image

Obviously it's still gonna come down to opinion in the end, but I hope that settles things a bit. :)
User avatar
Key-Glyph
Next-Gen
Posts: 1745
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:38 am
Location: Summer Games Challenge!
Contact:

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by Key-Glyph »

pankakes123 wrote:Obviously it's still gonna come down to opinion in the end, but I hope that settles things a bit. :)
I loved seeing your lists because except in one or two cases, they're very different from what I would chosen. It's cool to see exactly how much one's mileage can vary with this sort of thing.
Image
BogusMeatFactory wrote:If I could powder my copies of shenmue and snort them I would
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by DinnerX »

Pokemon is too complicated now in my opinion.

151 pokemon was perfectly manageable. Catching that many pokemon seemed within reach. Even by the gen III catching them all seemed impossible. Now it's just insane. 649 pokemon? I probably can't catch that many. I can't even remember the names of all the pokemon now, let alone their types, stats, and movesets. Worse, many new pokemon seem just seem like near clones of other existing pokemon. Every generation has the bird pokemon, the caterpillar pokemon...

In addition, each generation introduces new moves, items, and other subtleties. The complexity of the game has increased exponentially, and it wasn't exactly simple to begin with.

The big draws to pokemon for me were catching 'em all and devising strategies. I probably can't catch 649 pokemon and to devise any meaningful strategy I practically need to take a college course. The games are all but ruined for me right now. Maybe someday I'll adjust.

Generation 1 might be my favorite generation. Crystal sure was great though...
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
equalsign
Next-Gen
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:34 am

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by equalsign »

Vanilluxe and Garbodor are two of my favorite Gen 5 Pokemon. Pankakes... bro... WTF?

Edit: Just read the whole thread. So much Garbodor/Vanilluxe hate. I despised them too, for a time. Then I fell in love with the idea of using Pokemon that were corrosive to the souls of those I faced in battle. The first time I used my Garbodor against my best friend he shut off his system :lol: .

Seriously though, I love Garbodor's little mouth. The Vanilluxe family are among an extremely small number of pure ice type Pokemon, which I dig. Plus, they just look tasty.
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8876
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by alienjesus »

I can't say I'm a big fan of Garbodor, but I've always kinda like the Vanillish line. I dont really see an ice cream pokemon being any stupider than Gen 1's Exeggcute - who I also like.
Image
User avatar
AmishSamurai
Next-Gen
Posts: 2179
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by AmishSamurai »

Garbador is actually one of my favorite Pokemon, just because of his pained "WHY DO I EXIST? IT HURTS TO LIVE!" face when you realize his bag is just as big as his previous form's but his innards have grown to the point he burst open. It's little details like that.


I'd honestly say that Gen III, especially Emerald is my favorite gen. The environments were varied, secret bases were awesome, there were a whole bunch of side-places to explore and revisit once you got HMs (diving, the volcanic pass, Shoal Cave, Meteor Falls), and Battle Frontier was great.

Also, for those saying that Gen I pokemon are all inherently better than Gen V ones. I dare you to say that Caterpie is better than his stand-in Sewaddle.

Image

Look at this fucker. He is the most adorable sonofabitch you will ever meet. Let's see your Caterpie make :3 faces like that.
MrPopo wrote:The life lesson here is jobs will come and go, but Earthbound will always be there for you.
I'm a girl btw
eskil
32-bit
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:25 am

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by eskil »

Here's my take:
There are 151 Pokémon. No more. Any other Pokémons, games, trading cards etc. are FAKE. There is no such thing as "Generation 2", "Pokémon for DS" or "Saphire Version".

There is only red, blue and yellow.

Anything else is BLASPHEMY
User avatar
AmishSamurai
Next-Gen
Posts: 2179
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by AmishSamurai »

eskil wrote:Here's my take:
There are 151 Pokémon. No more. Any other Pokémons, games, trading cards etc. are FAKE. There is no such thing as "Generation 2", "Pokémon for DS" or "Saphire Version".

There is only red, blue and yellow.

Anything else is BLASPHEMY
That's rather closed-minded of you. It's like saying there was only ever one Mario or one Sonic game, or that Dragon Quest ended at the first, when several games after them improved on the formula so much and fixed so many issues.
MrPopo wrote:The life lesson here is jobs will come and go, but Earthbound will always be there for you.
I'm a girl btw
User avatar
Yancakes
64-bit
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:04 am
Location: Victoria, BC

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by Yancakes »

eskil wrote:Here's my take:
There are 151 Pokémon. No more. Any other Pokémons, games, trading cards etc. are FAKE. There is no such thing as "Generation 2", "Pokémon for DS" or "Saphire Version".

There is only red, blue and yellow.

Anything else is BLASPHEMY
See, that's taking it way too far to me. I mean, I very much prefer the originals, but there were lots of cool later pokemon... I think the mistake that Nintendo made was adding just too many with each generation- there's no need for another 150 every generation, I think even in the range of 25-40 would have kept the series super fresh and alienated fewer of the older players who hate change.

I'd be really interested a pokemon... not necessarily a reboot, but like a spinoff targeted more at the mid-teens age range than young kids. Obviously it'll never happen but it would be cool to see the pokemon numbers paired down to maybe 250 and reimagined.
User avatar
Dylan
Next-Gen
Posts: 2670
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Which Generation was best? (Pokemon Poll)

Post by Dylan »

alienjesus wrote:I can't say I'm a big fan of Garbodor, but I've always kinda like the Vanillish line. I dont really see an ice cream pokemon being any stupider than Gen 1's Exeggcute - who I also like.
I would make the distinction that eggs are still in the realm of living biological organisms, so personifying them as a sentient creature isn't as big a stretch. Vanillish is based off of an inanimate object, which is what lends to its silliness as a design for a living creature. Pokemon were very often inspired by real living organisms in previous generations (or if they were unique they were still clearly organisms), which is why modern ones based off of inanimate things like garbage, ice cream, or furniture look so out of place.
Image
Image
Post Reply