Systems you don't like.

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8445
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by o.pwuaioc »

I'd like to see a full list for all three, for as far as I know, there are only these:

http://www.racketboy.com/retro/sony/ps2 ... ion-2.html
http://www.racketboy.com/retro/microsof ... -xbox.html
http://www.racketboy.com/retro/nintendo ... games.html

Gamecube at least has the Game Boy Player. You're right tho that XBOX doesn't seem to have much.

loganm187 wrote:Sorry to post twice but, The PS2 and SNES have the best and most diverse library of games to ever grace consoles. If you don't like those two consoles you are just trying to start a fight for the sake of fighting and have no place in a game forum.

:?
User avatar
Weekend_Warrior
Next-Gen
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:48 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by Weekend_Warrior »

I love all the old classic Atari games. But I've never been a fan of the Atari 2600.

It's true that I didn't start gaming until the 'NES era' so I'm probably going to be a little biased towards the 2600's primitive graphics and poorly designed controllers. But honestly, I think they really should have spent a little more time into designing that system. The home console ports of some of their most popular arcade games ranged from God awful to just barely playable.

Maybe the technology and production costs weren't quite there yet - to manufacture and sell home systems with near arcade-quality graphics and sound for an affordable price. But if that's the case, maybe they should have waited a little while before pushing an under-powered Atari system out the door. They could've waited and done it right!?

I'm all for classic gaming. But I just can't imagine paying $5 or more for any Atari 2600 game
Last edited by Weekend_Warrior on Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:31 am, edited 3 times in total.
"Welcome to the circus of values!"

Currently Playing: Crysis (360), Destiny demo (PS3), Roadblasters (MAME)
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by noiseredux »

AmishSamurai wrote:noise has long been vocal in his dislike for Ocarina.


this much is true.
Image
User avatar
BurningDoom
Next-Gen
Posts: 5953
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:14 am

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by BurningDoom »

noiseredux wrote:
AmishSamurai wrote:noise has long been vocal in his dislike for Ocarina.


this much is true.


I stand with you. I haven't like any of the 3D Zeldas I've played, except Phantom Hourglass which had semi-3D parts with the ship.
Game Trade/Want List:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=28206

Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by noiseredux »

BurningDoom wrote:
noiseredux wrote:
AmishSamurai wrote:noise has long been vocal in his dislike for Ocarina.


this much is true.


I stand with you. I haven't like any of the 3D Zeldas I've played, except Phantom Hourglass which had semi-3D parts with the ship.


I didn't say I don't like any 3D Zelda games. I just think Ocarina is overrated and ugly. Majora's Mask is at least incredibly dark and insane so I like that one. But Wind
Waker -- OMG. Wind Waker is my 2nd fav Zelda game right after Link To The Past.
Image
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by BoringSupreez »

Weekend_Warrior wrote:I love all the old classic Atari games. But I've never been a fan of the Atari 2600.

It's true that I didn't start gaming until the 'NES era' so I'm probably going to be a little biased towards the 2600's primitive graphics and poorly designed controllers. But honestly, I think they really should have spent a little more time into designing that system. The home console ports of some of their most popular arcade games ranged from God awful to just barely playable.

Maybe the technology and production costs weren't quite there yet - to manufacture and sell home systems with near arcade-quality graphics and sound for an affordable pric. But if that's the case, maybe they should have waited a little while before pushing an under-powered Atari system out the door. They should have waited and done it right!

I'm all for classic gaming. But I just can't imagine paying $5 or more for any Atari 2600 game

Just imagine paying 40 1980 dollars for those games!
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Flake
Moderator
Posts: 8073
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:27 pm
Location: FoCo

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by Flake »

BoringSupreez wrote:Just imagine paying 40 1980 dollars for those games!


Quoted for truth. When I see people complain about the price of games today I want to invent a time machine so I can shove them into it.
Maybe now Nintendo will acknowledge Metroid has a fanbase?
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by DinnerX »

loganm187 wrote:Sorry to post twice but, The PS2 and SNES have the best and most diverse library of games to ever grace consoles. If you don't like those two consoles you are just trying to start a fight for the sake of fighting and have no place in a game forum.

I dislike the ps2 for reasons largely unrelated to its games.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by noiseredux »

Flake wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:Just imagine paying 40 1980 dollars for those games!


Quoted for truth. When I see people complain about the price of games today I want to invent a time machine so I can shove them into it.


I always think of this when I play Jaws on NES. I mean it's mildly fun in a weird nostalgic way. But sometimes I think back and it's like -- y'know why we played it so much back then? Cuz it cost us a bunch of money and we were too pissed off to not play it.
Image
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: Systems you don't like.

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

DinnerX wrote:
loganm187 wrote:Sorry to post twice but, The PS2 and SNES have the best and most diverse library of games to ever grace consoles. If you don't like those two consoles you are just trying to start a fight for the sake of fighting and have no place in a game forum.

I dislike the ps2 for reasons largely unrelated to its games.


If it's the "because it killed the Dreamcast" reason I'll come through the internet and punch you. :lol:

Regardless of what happened to Sega, the system is still brilliant.

Anyways, I can't really get into anything 8bit and before. There are some 8bit games I love sure, but for the most part I find the 8bit libraries dull.

So as mad as it will sound to some people, I don't really care for the NES, Atari, or SMS all that much.
Older. Not wiser.
Post Reply