Inazuma you outright pay your girlfriend to have sex with you? Not she pays part of the bills, you pay her specifically for the act?
But to get back on topic. I mostly agree with Mozgus. If he was making money on it, serves him right. Modding out of production consoles is one thing, modding current ones for profit is just not right.
The DMCA strikes again
Re: The DMCA strikes again
Let's not hijack this thread with another "Inazuma explains how the world really works" discussion.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
-
The Apprentice
- 128-bit
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: Wishing I was in California again
Re: The DMCA strikes again
If that guy sold one copy of any pirated contemporary software, he deserves every bit of punishment the law can throw at him. Pirating isn't the best of practices and is in the moral grey, but when you turn a profit on that stuff then things get fairly black and white.
Hatta wrote:Die Hard Arcade has Deep Scan in it. That's like retro inside retro. They must have heard we liked retro (dawg).
Jrecee wrote:What I like to do is knit little sweaters to put on the games.
Re: The DMCA strikes again
It's not fair to punish someone way more than they deserve. The RIAA will gladly sue someone for millions of dollars if they download a small handful of songs. It would be more fair to sue them about $30.The Apprentice wrote:If that guy sold one copy of any pirated contemporary software, he deserves every bit of punishment the law can throw at him. Pirating isn't the best of practices and is in the moral grey, but when you turn a profit on that stuff then things get fairly black and white.
This console modder guy is facing up to 10 years of jail time. While I agree his crime deserves some punishment since he was actually selling stuff, is 10 years of jail truly fair?
Re: The DMCA strikes again
I dunno. The jury will decide whether he's guilty or not and the judge will decide if 10 years if fair.Inazuma wrote: It's not fair to punish someone way more than they deserve. The RIAA will gladly sue someone for millions of dollars if they download a small handful of songs. It would be more fair to sue them about $30.
This console modder guy is facing up to 10 years of jail time. While I agree his crime deserves some punishment since he was actually selling stuff, is 10 years of jail truly fair?
Re: The DMCA strikes again
Depends. We don't know how much money and how money consoles were involved. You'll agree that if I steal $5 from someone on the street I shouldn't be punished as much as if I steal $5000 from someone on the street (assuming everything else is equal), right?Inazuma wrote:This console modder guy is facing up to 10 years of jail time. While I agree his crime deserves some punishment since he was actually selling stuff, is 10 years of jail truly fair?
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Re: The DMCA strikes again
Yeah, I agree with you on that. I just hate to read articles about the RIAA fining someone 22 thousand dollars per song they illegally downloaded.MrPopo wrote:Depends. We don't know how much money and how money consoles were involved. You'll agree that if I steal $5 from someone on the street I shouldn't be punished as much as if I steal $5000 from someone on the street (assuming everything else is equal), right?Inazuma wrote:This console modder guy is facing up to 10 years of jail time. While I agree his crime deserves some punishment since he was actually selling stuff, is 10 years of jail truly fair?
Re: The DMCA strikes again
I paid to have my consoles modded. I couldn't do it if I wanted it, and I don't. If my doing it with my property is not a crime, paying for someone else to do it shouldn't be either. If it is a crime, I should be arrested, not those who, by my request, did the work.
Re: The DMCA strikes again
Well, if it only becomes a crime when money is involved, you can just take money out of the equation. Find someone to agree to mod your console for free. And on a completely unrelated note, you can agree to buy a blank piece of paper from the modder for $40. No laws broken if it's done this way (^_^)jfrost wrote:I paid to have my consoles modded. I couldn't do it if I wanted it, and I don't. If my doing it with my property is not a crime, paying for someone else to do it shouldn't be either. If it is a crime, I should be arrested, not those who, by my request, did the work.
Re: The DMCA strikes again
Regardless of whether money has changed hands he's still broken the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.
The DMCA governs the breaking of copy protection schemes (amongst other things). Therefore the act of modifying consoles to bypass copy protection is illegal. Just as copying a DVD to your computer is a violation of the DMCA (you're bypassing the encryption on the DVD to copy the data to your computer, you can claim fair use but it's still a bit of a grey area).
Inazuma, you need to learn about your rights and the laws of your country before throwing blanket statements like that around. Just because you don't think it's illegal doesn't make it true.
The DMCA governs the breaking of copy protection schemes (amongst other things). Therefore the act of modifying consoles to bypass copy protection is illegal. Just as copying a DVD to your computer is a violation of the DMCA (you're bypassing the encryption on the DVD to copy the data to your computer, you can claim fair use but it's still a bit of a grey area).
Inazuma, you need to learn about your rights and the laws of your country before throwing blanket statements like that around. Just because you don't think it's illegal doesn't make it true.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys