What was the last movie you've seen?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Pulsar_t »

Office Space is the greatest critique of office culture there is.

Image

Fail-Safe. That this could have happened, and potentially still can, proves that humans are a race of rational lunatics. Often overshadowed by Dr. Strangelove (Took me too long to even realise it existed), Fail-Safe remains a terrifying classic among Cold War-era thrillers.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

Holy hell - I haven’t put up any reviews since February! I have only watched four movies in that time, but now will probably binge on them for a while. Here’s what I’ve watched in the past few months.

Choke (2008) – This was a so-so flick, but Sam Rockwell continues to impress in most everything I’ve seen him do. No, I haven’t read the book (for shame – I know!), but I found the story to be full of fun yet convoluted reveals. I watched this in late February and already have forgotten much about the direction, music, etc. Not especially memorable, although it is probably the funniest film about a sex addict I’ve seen in a while.
Grade: 2/5

Rope (1948) – This is one of my favorite Hitchcock films, and I re-watched it a month or so ago because of a screening I held in a course I teach. I’ve always feel that, stylistically, this is one of the more distinct Hitchcock films (with the long continuous shots, the happening of everything in real time, the meticulous set design, etc.). A visual treat, to be sure. That Hitchcock was able to slip the homosexual undertones in under the production code is still remarkable, but the real draw (as with most Hitchcock films) is the finely crafted sense of suspense. These aren’t the strongest acting performances and the black humor is hit and miss, but the film is a must-see for any fan of the genre or the director.
Grade: 4/5

Coraline (2008) – A beautifully realized world with a story that runs out of steam 2/3 of the way through. The film’s look is quite remarkable - you get a sense that the artists involved were allowed to let their imagination run wild, and the results are stunning. Coraline herself is a very well developed character, as are many of her supporting cast members (the Russian was my personal favorite). Unfortunately, once the “wonder” is gone, the last third of the film ends the otherwise twisted take on an Alice in Wonderland-esque story on a bit of a flat and predictable note. It strikes me as a kid-friendly version of Pan’s Labrynth, but without the gripping final act.
Grade: 3.5/5

Right at Your Door (2006) – An intriguing film that does a good job of preying on audience fears about the horrors of biological warfare. The cinematography is probably the most memorable aspect of the film, as the direction in the first 20 minutes or so does a great job of creating a tense sensation of one man fighting against a world that Is closing in around him. The rest of the film has some problems though, and seemingly reveals what I assume are the limitations of its budget. Too many scenes are close ups of talking through plastic, and much of the conversation is predictable and droll. The gardener seems to exist simply to allow the main character to verbalize his thoughts, the girlfriend is largely unsympathetic, and the kid gets too little screen time for us to really care about him. Still, the ending (and the “twist”) almost match the brilliance of the opening scenes. It will be interesting to see what the director does next, if afforded a bit more of a budget.
Grade: 3/5
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

Yesterday I posted four reviews for the only four films I’d seen since February. I suggested I’d be binging on films for a while, and got off to a great start in the last 24 hours with five – count ‘em – five films since yesterday morning! Here are the reviews:

Stagecoach (1939) – I feel somewhat bad giving this film the grade below that I did, as the film is a true pioneer and innovator in the Western genre. Still, it seems to me that Ford later perfected the formula he starts to play with here (most notably in The Searchers). The highlights? Character development and direction – Wayne steals the show, but all of the folks in the stagecoach are all interesting and the roles are well acted. Monument Valley looks great as always and some of the action scenes are really ahead of their time. Visually, even simple stuff like how the caravan arrives into town, how Wayne’s character is introduced, etc. – these are all worth seeing. The plot, unfortunately, is less than compelling and after about half way through seemed lose any sense of suspense it may have had early on. A film worth seeing for fans of the genre or the historical film buff, but the rest of you will probably want to pass.
Grade: 3.5/5

RocknRolla (2008) – I am a big fan of Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch, and was hoping this would offer more of the same. It does, to an extent: the dark humor and quick-cut self-aware directing are present, the crime element is strong, etc. However, the story itself is less interesting and outside of Wilkinson and a few of the tertiary characters, the film fails to deliver many great performances from rest of the cast. Overall, it feels like Ritchie is stuck in neutral as a director and while the film is enjoyable, it is ultimately less than the sum of its parts.
Grade: 3/5

Drag Me to Hell (2009) – While many point to Army of Darkness as their favorite Raimi film, I’ve always preferred the first two Evil Dead films. Like many, I was anxious to see whether or not his post-Spider-man return to the horror genre could recapture what made those films great. Any doubts I had that Raimi might lose his touch were erased with the equally hilarious and creepy scene in the car a few minutes into the film. From then on, the film delivers in spades. Like the Evil Dead films, Drag Me to Hell offers a campy/goofy send up of the horror genre mixed with some genuine frights/thrills. I was alternately tense and laughing at various points in the film, which is exactly what I had hoped to get from Raimi.
Grade: 4/5

Tetsuo: The Iron Man (1989) - Marvel fans need not apply for this one, it isn’t what you might think. The plot here is interesting enough (if sometimes difficult to discern), but the allure of this film is the disturbing imagery, the innovate and stylized effects (quite incredible for ’89), and the pounding industrial soundtrack. Much of his film felt like an early 90s industrial band music video, but with more of a cyberpunk feel than was often found on the stuff on MTV (which was usually more goth). In any case, it is easy to see how the film influenced subsequent 90s indie cinema: sharp contrast and heavy saturation, quick cuts and time-manipulation, and a focus on style over story (think Pi, for example). Memorable.
Grade: 3.5/5

Werner Herzog Eats His Shoe
(1980) – I stumbled across this short documentary film when checking out Herzog’s filmography (after reading some of the reviews above :)). You can find it on the web easily enough, and is something worth seeing for those with a taste for the bizarre (or for footwear). The philosophizing and so forth is all well and good, but basically functions as a warrant for the main event. It’s an interesting little slice of the director’s sole.
Grade: 2.5/5

My appetite is still not sated, so yet more film reviews will be up soon!
User avatar
Bootaaay
128-bit
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:31 am
Location: England

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Bootaaay »

dsheinem wrote:Tetsuo: The Iron Man (1989) - Marvel fans need not apply for this one, it isn’t what you might think. The plot here is interesting enough (if sometimes difficult to discern), but the allure of this film is the disturbing imagery, the innovate and stylized effects (quite incredible for ’89), and the pounding industrial soundtrack. Much of his film felt like an early 90s industrial band music video, but with more of a cyberpunk feel than was often found on the stuff on MTV (which was usually more goth). In any case, it is easy to see how the film influenced subsequent 90s indie cinema: sharp contrast and heavy saturation, quick cuts and time-manipulation, and a focus on style over story (think Pi, for example). Memorable.
Grade: 3.5/5
Pretty spot on review, i'm a big fan of Shinya Tsukamoto - if you haven't already, you should check out some of his more recent works such as Tokyo Fist, A Snake of June, Haze and the excellent psychological thriller Vital. They aren't as experimental as his Testsuo films (he's currently working on a 3rd Tetsuo, btw), but are nonetheless just as bizzare.

Valhalla Rising by Nicolas Winding Refn

Image

This seems to be quite a divisive movie - on the one hand, it's a breathtaking work of cinematography and the director creates a wonderfully dense and opressive atmosphere through the stark enviroment that plays backdrop to the films chaotic events, the sparse and suspensful dialogue and the droning martial industrial soundtrack. On the other hand, this is an experimental film marketed as an action movie - on more than one occasion I saw it mentioned in the same breath as 2007's Beowulf or the recent remake of Clash of the Titans. I can only assume that anyone viewing the film under a pretence of similarity with those aforementioned movies would be greatly disapointed, and even though I largely enjoyed the movie at home I have to question whether i'd feel the same after viewing it in the cinema.

You see, nothing much happens in Valhalla rising. The film ostensibly tells the story of One-Eye, a savage mute living a life of captivity among the pagan tribes of Scotland and forced to fight in brutal deathmatches. He eventually wins his freedom and joins with a group of Christian mercenaries intent on reclaiming the holy land, but once their voyage begins things take a turn for the weird and they find themselves stranded in a strange land seemingly untouched by civilisation. Although the plot is fairly straight forward, the manner in which it's handled is decidedly experimental and vague and leads one to believe that there's a deeper subtext to be found.

The film is broken into a number of sections, each labelled in a religious tone as much of the movie seems to be a comment on the differences between the pagan religion of old and the invading Christian beliefs - the protagonist himself recalls Odin, with his solitary eye and cryptic visions of the future, and while the Christian characters stumble blindly towards their fate, pleading and begging for mercy, One-Eye heads unflinchingly into the fate laid out for him, just like the pagan chieftans at the beginning, knowing their days were numbered in the face of the relentless tide of Christianity.

Overall i'd reccomend Valhalla Rising - it's certainly not a movie for everyone, not a movie i'd ever watch with company and certainly not a movie i'd try and sell as an action blockbuster, but Nicolas Winding Refn has succeeded here in creating a deep and intriguing world with this film and on a relatively meagre budget. There are some fantastic performances from the cast, a handful of vicious and bloody fight scenes and beautiful, arresting imagery throughout. It's a film that has left me contemplating it's meaning long after I had finished watching, and while it's not an experience that may appeal to many, ultimately it's films like this that inspire and intiruge that are the one's worth watching.
Image
PSN; Bootaaay ---------------------------------------------------------------- XBL; B007444Y
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by noiseredux »

D, two things:

1.) I hate to be that guy, because I HATE that guy; but the book CHOKE is so much better than the movie. Don't get me wrong, the nudity helped the film (haha) but if you read the book then so many subtle things in the movie will be far better explained. There's just so much in the book that it was impossible to cram it all into 90 mins (though they tried!) It's definitely my favorite of his books.

2) who the HELL has ever said Army of Darkness was their favorite Raimi film? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love it. But dude -- The Evil Dead is perhaps my favorite horror film of all time. And The Evil Dead 2 is a near-perfect blend of horror and comedy. (Hormedy?) At any rate, I was happy to see him return to horror, even if I didn't love Drag Me, it was a genuinely "raimi-ish" horror film (the goat at the table! the funeral scene! etc) and I'd like to think that this will make him want to get back to the genre more consistently. Maybe even complete the fabled Evil Dead 4.
Image
fastbilly1
Site Admin
Posts: 13775
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by fastbilly1 »

Ill say Army of Darkness is my favorite Raimi film. Evil Dead 1&2 are better films, but Army is just campy and fun. I talked to Bruce at length about Evil Dead 4 at a private screening of My Name is Bruce and he said that as much as people want it, to not hold out for it since more than likely it wont be happening. Partially because he thinks he is too old for the part.

My last film was Walle. I finally sat down and watched the whole thing in one sitting. Incredibly touching story that taught me to not trust Fred Willard!
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by noiseredux »

fastbilly1 wrote:Ill say Army of Darkness is my favorite Raimi film. Evil Dead 1&2 are better films, but Army is just campy and fun. I talked to Bruce at length about Evil Dead 4 at a private screening of My Name is Bruce and he said that as much as people want it, to not hold out for it since more than likely it wont be happening. Partially because he thinks he is too old for the part.
for a while there was a talk of a new Evil Dead that would not star Bruce. Now before you scream heracy, listen to this: the idea was that it took place NOW all these years after the original films. And a new set of teenagers would go the cabin and be haunted. A lot of people hated the idea, but in a sense, that fits the concept of the series quite well. If you think about what Army Of Darkness was saying (and WITHING THE WOODS) then it was like the evil was always in those woods, and always will be. Sure Ash is the hero we know, but really the Woods have always been the star. Now I'm not saying I WANT a non-Ash Evil Dead. i'm just saying if Raimi made it, I'd see. A lot of times. Just like the others.
Image
fastbilly1
Site Admin
Posts: 13775
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by fastbilly1 »

I am aware. But it is not Evil Dead without Bruce, plain and simple. He ruined Pitfall for me aswell.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by noiseredux »

fastbilly1 wrote:I am aware. But it is not Evil Dead without Bruce. Plain and simple. He ruined Pitfall for me aswell.
I know. but. I'd still see. It a lot.
Image
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by dsheinem »

noiseredux wrote:D, two things:

1.) I hate to be that guy, because I HATE that guy; but the book CHOKE is so much better than the movie. Don't get me wrong, the nudity helped the film (haha) but if you read the book then so many subtle things in the movie will be far better explained. There's just so much in the book that it was impossible to cram it all into 90 mins (though they tried!) It's definitely my favorite of his books.

2) who the HELL has ever said Army of Darkness was their favorite Raimi film? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love it. But dude -- The Evil Dead is perhaps my favorite horror film of all time. And The Evil Dead 2 is a near-perfect blend of horror and comedy. (Hormedy?) At any rate, I was happy to see him return to horror, even if I didn't love Drag Me, it was a genuinely "raimi-ish" horror film (the goat at the table! the funeral scene! etc) and I'd like to think that this will make him want to get back to the genre more consistently. Maybe even complete the fabled Evil Dead 4.
1) I'm sure the book is better - C.P. is a great writer, and it is hard to translate his stuff to the screen. My score is based on the merits of the film as a stand-alone entity.

2) Plenty of folks prefer Army, especially those who aren't a big fan of the horror genre. I've always seen Army as doing for the action genre what the first two Evil Dead films do for the horror genre (a campy send up with some genuinely well done genre-staple moments). Part of the reason I liked Drag Me to Hell so much is because it contains that same wit, but updated for modern audiences who have seen more recent horror films. I would imagine Evil Dead 4 would be a little heavier on the camp, but I'd hope that it retained the same "updated" look and feel as Drag Me to Hell.
Post Reply