TornadoCreator wrote:Reprise wrote:Least favourite: PS2(/PS1)
Like I said above, the console is a weird one for me. Many consider it one of the greatest systems of all time, with a huge lineup of brilliant games. I, on the other hand, consider it a bit of a jack of all trades, but master of none. I know many will read my words with disgust, but of all the games I own for the system, I still play it the least out of all my consoles. Nothing about it really excites me much and it lacks the personality of my other consoles.
Really? You play your N64 and Gamecube more than your PS2?
I agree the PS2 did lack an identity for most people, but this is more because of the way gaming went. People became unfamilar with genre catergorisation and it gave rise to the "Action Adventure" catch all.
The PS2 did the best 'Beat-Em Ups'. You know, games where you beat up loads of people using simple combo strings, not quite a fighting game, but more combat than a platfomer, like Streets Of Rage and Final Fight... they didn't stop making these when gaming went 3D, they just call them "Action Adventure" like EVERY OTHER GAME. In 3D they used to be called 'Hack n Slash' or more fittingly 'Brawler' (which I prefer as 'Hack n Slash' was the name used for games like 'Diablo' or 'Titan Quest' on PC) but for some reason no-one uses those names anymore. Games like 'Devil May Cry', 'God Of War', 'Onimusha', 'Dynasty Warriors 4', 'Ninja Gaiden Sigma', 'Shinobi', 'X-Men 3', 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine', 'Ghost Rider' and many more and then there's Action Platformers which again got branded "Action Adventure" like everything else, like 'Shadow Of The Colossus', 'Prince Of Persia', 'Tomb Raider Legend' and 'Spiderman: Web Of Shadows' and lastly there's open-world games of Sandbox games as they've become known as. 'Just Cause', 'Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction' and the most famous franchise for Sandbox games, 'GTA: Vice City', 'GTA: San Andreas' and 'GTA: Liberty City Stories'
This is the PS2's "personality" as I see it as the 3D Action games platform, but it's also a great Traditional 3D Platformer console with the 'Jak & Daxter' and 'Ratchet & Clank' series as well as the cross platform stuff like 'Rayman 3' and 'Psychonauts'. It's just that the PS3 never pushed a specific genre.
Dreamcast was the Arcade and Fighting game machine.
Gamecube was for local multiplayer, Resident Evil and Nintendo FPF.
Xbox was for First Person Shooters.... well Halo
PS2 was... for everything else
Honestly, it was a close call. N64 would be just behind the PS2 for my least favourite console, but even still, I do love all my consoles, otherwise I wouldn't own them.
I nearly said N64, but I still have some amazing multi-player experiences on that console. I know you're not a fan of the console, and maybe I do kind of view it through rose-tinted glasses whilst playing or remembering the console, but sod it, I do love it. I love Goldeneye (yeah, sue me

), I love Perfect Dark (even with its immensely poor 1 frame per hour hour framerate during 4 player games), I love Super Mario 64, and I love the Zeldas - especially Majora's Mask. I love Conker's Bad Fur Day and its sense of humour, despite what you say about it being childish lol, and well, I love a lot of the other games I own for it.
As for the Gamecube, I play a hell of a lot of the Resident Evils, Eternal Darkness, Tales of Symphonia, Pikmin, Twilight Princess, F Zero GX, Metroid Prime, Viewtiful Joe, Super Monkey Ball and loads of multi-format games that I just prefer on the Gamecube, as the controller kicks the PS2's ass (oh yeah, another thing I forgot to mention, screw you Sony fan boys, the Playstation controllers suck ass!

).
But like I said, I love all my consoles anyways. I'm only comparing them on the basis of how much I play them and how much enjoyment I seem to get from them. The PS2 just happens to be the lowest for the reasons I've already stated. That and the fact that besides Shadow of the Colossus, none of the games have quite blown me away in the same way many of the games I own on other consoles.