Page 3 of 5

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:12 pm
by Funk, E
Emulation really is totally easy--it only becomes even slightly difficult when you get into the newer systems.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:48 pm
by marurun
Well, I think the goal here is not to make things more difficult for people. But unless we REALLY want to limit our game and system choices to certain well-traveled paths, emulation does actually make participation easier, because people don't have to go out hunting for hardware and games that may be damn near impossible to find.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:57 am
by Doomsan
Sing me in! with emulation everyone can join and it'll be better.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:03 am
by raztat
put the game names on small pieces of paper and put them in a hat and pick one at random and that will be the game for the moment.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:20 am
by Doomsan
The better part of this is that i feel up to play even bad games, just for the sake of sharing thoughts and ideas, please lets make this happen!!

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:24 am
by peace4myheart
I am all for random selection, though quirky and less known games definitely need some loving first, especially some of those hidden gems on Racketboy's lists.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:44 am
by NebachadnezzaR
I voted semi-chronological. I don't like random because it might make things harder for us when we "go back", like playing an 8 bit game after a 16 bit one. If you play Chrono Trigger after Asteroids it'll look like next-gen, but if you play it after Jet Set Radio it won't be so impressive.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:50 am
by Doomsan
Yeah semi-chronological will be better. I think we could make this by genre, and go through the most important titles throughout the years, and the selection of the titles could be by voting.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:10 am
by brianon
Random might be better.

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:08 am
by thrashtronaut
Also voted for random. It'll be nice to mix it up vs. playing strictly 8-bit titles for a couple months...