The payoff's always been for the rich and the pot of gold is full of shit now.Retrogamer0001 wrote:There's no gold at the end of that rainbow...
Hi ho.
Hi ho.
It's off to work we go...
The payoff's always been for the rich and the pot of gold is full of shit now.Retrogamer0001 wrote:There's no gold at the end of that rainbow...
Maddens, NCAAs, BiowareBoneSnapDeez wrote:Plenty of LJN games are perfectly fine.
But yeah, I predictably choose Nintendo.
Not a bad pick. Life would be rough without PGA Tour '97.Jmustang1968 wrote:Ready for an unpopular one? EA
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
1) We're talking about the games they've made during their entire historyViolent By Design wrote:I find it interesting that Nintendo is supposed to be the obvious choice, yet most gamers opt out of getting a Wii-U, which is essentially saying they can live without Nintendo.
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Many people here own Jaguars too, what does that mean?2) Many people here own a Wii U
Sounds like you're living well without one.3) Many of those who don't own one yet (me included) are waiting for a price drop and for more games to come out (and preferably bigger memory too).
Means they like owning crappy niche consoles with less a library worth playing than the Wii U?Violent By Design wrote:Many people here own Jaguars too, what does that mean?2) Many people here own a Wii U