Psst, why use Modern Armor when you can rush out Gatlings in the year 1000?BoringSupreez wrote:I prefer a General, so I can load him up with Modern Armor and take over the world.
But I'm happy someone got the "joke"
Psst, why use Modern Armor when you can rush out Gatlings in the year 1000?BoringSupreez wrote:I prefer a General, so I can load him up with Modern Armor and take over the world.
You know, this is just an interpretation. There are multiple ways to read the Bible. Heck, even using the Apocalypse of John for the "end times" is very bad theology since its genre, unbeknownst to later Christians, wasn't meant to be read as a predictive text, but a "secret". καλύπτειν means "to hide", thus ἀποκάλυψις is an uncovering, and is meant to be figured out; none of it is meant to be taken literal. Rather, it's a secret because what it actually advocated is revolutionary change - the antichrist is actually Nero (whose name in gematria comes out to 666).BoringSupreez wrote:People who say they've just started recently haven't read the Bible. The end times began the moment Jesus left the earth.flojocabron wrote:Some may think that the biblical end times may have already started.
Oh, the irony.I don't give the 2012 stuff any credit. The Mayans just decided to stop their calendar there, that's all. Why should anyone think that a primitive Indian tribe would know the date the world ends?





