You are completely off your rocker with this one.. The xbox has one of the worst D-Pads of all time.. Not to mention the triggers do nothing for most genres except FPS games..silverback wrote:
I used to love the dual shock controller as I said.
It is in no way anywhere near as good as the 360 controller. The ps3 controller is lightweight and cheaply made, its also sized for childrens hands, my 2 year old can hold the ps3 controller fine.
The Dual Shock 3 has triggers are you kidding me with this one? You can use the dual sticks, triggers, or go old school with O and X..the ps controller is in no way better for racing games, the xbox you use the triggers its natural, ps you have to use the sticks which is awkward.
I have big hands and have never had problems with the Dual Shock 3.. Both the DS 3 and 360 controller are cheaply made and break if they hit the ground the wrong way.. I've had Xbox controllers fail on me mechanically, but never had a problem with PS controllers.. I'll say that both suck with fighting games, but the PS3 is slightly better because of the D-Pad.. I prefer the Dual Shock 2.. Most people agree that PS has had some great controllers in past generations from ps1 and ps2..My hand gets terrible cramps after an hour or so on the ps3 but can play hours on end with the xbox controller.
i have to say i'm surprised as your the first to ever have said the ps3 controller is better.
I am not starting arguments I am simply telling the truth, I have bought all my consoles with my own money and the games and the big plasma tv's to play them on.
I really don't know what you're talking about with this one.. Most people agree that Sony has made great controllers and much better than Xbox.. Not to mention the high failure rate of MS mouses and keyboards for the PC.. And I notice a common theme with Xbox fans spewing fanboyism to anyone who criticizes the Xbox for anything...
