Page 3 of 5

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:00 am
by fastbilly1
The week before Christmas I did about an hour of work at my job and was there for four ten hour days - I read alot of Wookiepedia, Wikipedia, and a couple books.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:59 pm
by JWatts
I never knew so much about a throw away line now that I've read this thread. I knew it was the model number but little did i know the model number actually meant something!

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:14 pm
by DownSince86
Luke wrote:
MrPopo wrote:Going by the Expanded Universe, the R2 is a general astromech droid, while the R4 is a cheaper consumer version designed more for vehicle maintenance, as the average consumer doesn't have a fancy starship.


I guess I just long for continuity.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

That guy hits the nail on the head.

The first three were great. I'm thankful I can remember a time before episode 1 came out.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:22 pm
by Octopod
I like Star Wars as a stand alone film. Empire is alright but nowhere near as good and Jedis first half was decent but it got real stupid real fast. The newer films I do not even care about at all.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:27 pm
by Luke
DownSince86 wrote:That guy hits the nail on the head.

The first three were great. I'm thankful I can remember a time before episode 1 came out.


The creators of Star Wars said it better: (paraphrased from the commentary on SW SE)

"We needed to have a love story, but not a mushy love story"

"We needed to have humor, but not slapstick humor"

It's odd, because that is what I thought was wrong with the prequels. The love story was all "kissy-kissy", and the humor was slapstick.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:30 pm
by Luke
Octopod wrote:I like Star Wars as a stand alone film.

Empire is alright but nowhere near as good and Jedis first half was decent but it got real stupid real fast. The newer films I do not even care about at all.


Star Wars is great as a stand alone, but I enjoy the storyline of 4,5 & 6.

I think they all hold up really well too. What did you think was stupid about JEDI?

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:31 pm
by Octopod
Um, the Ewoks.

The Jabba stuff was all decent enough though, like I said. Once they go to Endor though it just gets bad.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:34 pm
by Limewater
Luke wrote:I think they all hold up really well too. What did you think was stupid about JEDI?


I kind of think Jedi is the weakest in the original trilogy, as well. The whole ewok part of the story was pretty silly.

It has definitely suffered the most under Lucas' revisions. I find the special edition to be almost unwatchable.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:47 pm
by Luke
Octopod wrote:Um, the Ewoks.


You must have never met Wicket when you were a kid.

Image

I wish I still owned that shirt.

Re: Star Wars Question

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:50 pm
by Octopod
I think Star Wars was meant to be a stand alone film as well. It is a complete story for the most part. If Star Wars would have had tits and ass in it it would have been playing in the grindhouses with spaghetti westerns and Kung-fu flicks. It was successfull though so he continued on with the story. I know he says it was all thought out all along but I do not believe that bullshit for a second. Luke and Leia were never meant to be brother and sister and Vader was never meant to be Lukes father. That is more soap opera than space opera, guess he got confused. :P (I know that that is not really funny) Plus it has Peter Cushing in it.