
Crappy CG, crappy acting, crappy action. LHF is the perfect in-flight movie.
In fact the CG is so bad, it's probably the worst of all time.


PSN: Green-Whiskeyninjainspandex wrote:Maybe I'm just a pervert
admittedly, it's a slow burner. And I love slow burners. But it's possible you'll enjoy it more 10 years from now.Forlorn Drifter wrote: It Follows: While it was good from a cinema and... uhh, can't think of a good word, thematic? standpoint, I found it somewhat dull quite honestly. I might have overhyped the movie for myself waiting for a chance to see it, I'm not sure.
I see where you are going with that, and its a good point. For me, as someone who usually doesn't have an issue with slow burners, I just felt like the horror of it all was lacking for me. Body horror and sexual horror usually hit me a bit, but here it didn't, and I'm not sure why.noiseredux wrote:admittedly, it's a slow burner. And I love slow burners. But it's possible you'll enjoy it more 10 years from now.Forlorn Drifter wrote: It Follows: While it was good from a cinema and... uhh, can't think of a good word, thematic? standpoint, I found it somewhat dull quite honestly. I might have overhyped the movie for myself waiting for a chance to see it, I'm not sure.
Spoiler for those who haven't seen it yet (see it!)
PSN: Green-Whiskeyninjainspandex wrote:Maybe I'm just a pervert
PSN: Green-Whiskeyninjainspandex wrote:Maybe I'm just a pervert
It's definitely not everyone's cup of tea. I love it, I actually purchased it twice. Maika was great, the rest of the cast was admirable. You have to realize the movie only had a reported budget of two million as well, considering that, it is a hell of an accomplishment.Forlorn Drifter wrote: It Follows: While it was good from a cinema and... uhh, can't think of a good word, thematic? standpoint, I found it somewhat dull quite honestly. I might have overhyped the movie for myself waiting for a chance to see it, I'm not sure.
