noiseredux vs. Dreamcast ....version 3.0?

Show your reviewing skills by collaborating with other forums members to review games of all ages.
elmagicochrisg
Next-Gen
Posts: 5048
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: In my own little world...

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by elmagicochrisg »

AppleQueso wrote:
foxhound1022 wrote:Dood, you seriously need to get MK ll for Saturn. Just awesome. :mrgreen:

I love how it's missing sound effects that were in the Genesis version.

and how it actually has to load special moves mid-fight

I love your cynicism in combination with that avatar... :lol:
Image

Dreamcast DUX Limited Edition for sale (new, odorless and sealed)

All forum members are equal. But some are more equal than others. - George Orwell
AppleQueso

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by AppleQueso »

foxhound1022 wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
foxhound1022 wrote:Dood, you seriously need to get MK ll for Saturn. Just awesome. :mrgreen:


I love how it's missing sound effects that were in the Genesis version.

and how it actually has to load special moves mid-fight


Maybe it wasn't the Saturn version? Dammit, now I'm confused; now I gotta see if it sucks. I haven't played it in such a long time.

The only older MK's I sunk a lot of time into were 3,UMK3, and MK Trilogy.


UMK3 has a pretty solid Saturn port. Trilogy's is pretty good too, but it's really hard to find and doesn't offer anything over the Ps1 version.

Best MK2 ports were 32x and SNES. You might've been thinking of the 32X version?

elmagicochrisg wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
foxhound1022 wrote:Dood, you seriously need to get MK ll for Saturn. Just awesome. :mrgreen:

I love how it's missing sound effects that were in the Genesis version.

and how it actually has to load special moves mid-fight

I love your cynicism in combination with that avatar... :lol:


Image
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by CD AGES »

foxhound1022 wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
foxhound1022 wrote:Dood, you seriously need to get MK ll for Saturn. Just awesome. :mrgreen:


I love how it's missing sound effects that were in the Genesis version.

and how it actually has to load special moves mid-fight


Maybe it wasn't the Saturn version? Dammit, now I'm confused; now I gotta see if it sucks. I haven't played it in such a long time.

The only older MK's I sunk a lot of time into were 3,UMK3, and MK Trilogy.


Yes, MK II was a dissapointment on the Saturn. Lots of missing audio samples and dreaded loading that occurs during specials much like Apple has mentioned. UMK3 port looks good at first glance but its also a piece of shit port if you ask me. The stupid developers who handled the SAT conversion took the code for PSX port of MK3 and simply added to it (and they didn't even pull this off correctly as MK3 levels that aren't in UMK3 linger as well as a Noob Saibot that is still modeled by Kano as oppose to a proper ninja that you see in UMK3). The end result it a game that doesn't play like MK3 or its update. Balance is thrown out the window with glitches galore and combos that shouldn't even work like (infinite galore!). MKT on the saturn is decent though althoigh doesn't run as smooth as the PSX version.
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by CD AGES »

I do agree though that MK II on the 32X was very well done. Improved audio over the GEN version and additional frames restored. It's perhaps my favorite 32X game next to chaotix and VF.
AppleQueso

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by AppleQueso »

I don't really play fighters on a high enough level to take much notice of UMK3's balance issues and whatnot on Saturn. For casual play it's plenty fine I think, though the load times are pretty annoying and way too frequent. Why does it have to load fatalities? Why can't it load them at the beginning of the match along with everything else? Why does it have to load all over again when going into round 2?

The MK2 port on Saturn isn't even suitable for casual play, imo. Such a shame, considering the Saturn really shouldn't have any problem handling a near arcade-perfect version.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by noiseredux »

CD AGES, what's your take on the DC port of MVC2? I've been playing it pretty much all day, and starting to really love it. I've never been a big fan of MVC2, and have played the PS2 and PSN ports prior. But I've been having so much fun unlocking characters I've really started to get into this one.

Still really need a DC fightpad haha.
Image
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by CD AGES »

I understand. But def something to keep in mind though. Its better off playing UMK3 on SNES, GEN, or PS2 via MKA limited Edition.
The MK2 port on Saturn isn't even suitable for casual play, imo. Such a shame, considering the Saturn really shouldn't have any problem handling a near arcade-perfect version.


Agreed. Always wonder how the PSX port of MKII stacks up...
AppleQueso

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by AppleQueso »

CD AGES wrote:Always wonder how the PSX port of MKII stacks up...

I've read up on it a bit and seen videos. Seems to offer very little over the Saturn verison. Doesn't seem worth hunting down to me.
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by CD AGES »

CD AGES, what's your take on the DC port of MVC2? I've been playing it pretty much all day, and starting to really love it. I've never been a big fan of MVC2, and have played the PS2 and PSN ports prior. But I've been having so much fun unlocking characters I've really started to get into this one.

Still really need a DC fightpad haha.


Oh don't get me started! One word, Fantastic!!!
There something special about MVC2 running on Dreamcast hardware at least to me... and not just because the game was destined for an arcade perfect translation on the platform due to its NAOMI heritage. Maybe because the original MVC1 is also available on the same console and was a good indicator of the systems capabilities in bringing the arcade experience home without compromises. Maybe because a nice chunk of the roster feels like they represent some good on the dreamcast as individuals (Jill in RE3, Jin in Tech Romancer, Hayato in Plasma Sword, the Darkstalkers cast in Vampire Chronicle, hell even Amingo feels like should be part of the Samba de Amigo cast LOL!)
User avatar
foxhound1022
Next-Gen
Posts: 2282
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:20 pm
Location: The mean streets of SouthTown

Re: noiseredux vs. Sega

Post by foxhound1022 »

Yup. It sucks ball-sack. I had all of the MK's for SNES originally; MK 1,2,3, & UMK 3. I had Trilogy on N64, which was actually a decent port. The only good fighting game for the console, IMO.
Post Reply