What was the last movie you've seen?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Cronozilla
Next-Gen
Posts: 2609
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:15 pm
Location: Oregon, USA.

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Cronozilla »

The books are the ones that get the praise ... I can't remember ever hearing anyone praise the old Gatsby movie. Everyone thought it was terrible because it doesn't translate well.

All of those books were some of the first to do what they do. Looking back it's difficult to appreciate a now common element of writing that at the time was very unique.

People in future generations will do the same thing to movies that we felt were groundbreaking (or games for that matter) because the same elements have been absorbed into the common tool-kit of the medium.

I saw Die Hard 5 ... which isn't a Die Hard movie at all.
I liked it fine in terms of being an action movie, but this was absolutely not Die Hard. It's kind of annoying that the sequels are starting to make With a Vengeance look good :|
User avatar
RCBH928
Next-Gen
Posts: 6082
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:40 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by RCBH928 »

I never knew that kind of thing happened in literature, but I understand. People probably will never know what Mario Bros. , Resident Evil, The Matrix, or The Sixth Sense when it first came out. Maybe Harry Potter and The Da Vinci Code fit the description.


What is wrong with With a Vengeance ? I thought it was amazing movie.
User avatar
Michi
Next-Gen
Posts: 4815
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Florida

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Michi »

Burn, Witch, Burn!
AKA, Night of the Eagle
Image

It’s been a while, but TCM looks like it’s going to give me a bit more to work with this month. In anticipation I double checked by backlog (to purge the DVR) and discovered I’d missed this delightful little film about witchcraft. Considering the time of year, I thought it would be a good way to kick off the month of October before I switch over to the ‘all things horror’ thread in General Discussions.


Norman Taylor is a man of science. Norman is a new member of the faculty at a nearby college and very popular with the students. As a psychology professor he often gives lectures regarding the supernatural (Something they never did in my psychology class. The cheap bastards.)

Of course, Norman is a rationalist. And, as a rationalist, doesn’t believe in any of that superstitious mumbo-jumbo. So when he goes around his house one day and starts discovering odd trinkets hidden about he starts to get a little suspicious. Finding dead spiders in ornate containers while looking through your sock drawer can be a bit unsettling, after all. That suspicion then turns to being just short of pissed when he realizes his wife, Tansy, has not only been dabbling in witchcraft to try to further his career, but has been doing it under his nose for years.

Image
Damn it, Norman! I told you, they’re not magic charms! I just didn’t feel like vacuuming today! I told you, if you’d wipe your feet
before you came inside we wouldn’t have this problem.


Being the reasonable man of reason that he is, he gives her only one course of action: Burn all this sh!t right now, or else. Because as a psychology professor he knows that having someone suddenly and completely destroy a huge chunk of a belief system they’ve had for years can’t at all be detrimental to ones psyche…

Image
Whoopsie

Tansy reluctantly does as he asks, but immediately after things start going downhill. First, a truck almost turns him into Norman paste on the way to work, then when he gets to school he finds out he’s been accused of rape, which leads to the girls boyfriend threatening him with a gun, and then….Well, basically his life just took a swan dive off the shallow end of the college’s empty swimming pool.

Meanwhile, the troubles continue at home. The phone rings, but there’s no one on the line, odd noises are heard on the recordings of Normans lectures, and someone (or something?) continually pounds and rattles the door.

Norman brushes the increasingly odd disturbances off as coincidence at first, but poor Tansy can’t take it anymore. Norman wakes up to find a letter one morning in which Tansy explains that she’s leaving to draw the evil forces away and will be sacrificing herself to save his unbelieving ass.

Image
In her defense, if I had to wake up to that every morning I might off myself too.

Norman manages to save her, but the seed has been planted and doubts start circulating in his mind about whether or not there really are evil forces working against him and if he can stop them if there are.



Despite the violence the title suggests, Burn, Witch, Burn! is more of a psychological horror film than a violent one. It’s has a strong focus on atmosphere and a tension that builds and builds as the story progresses. In that respect, it is very similar to another British production I’ve watched, Night of the Demon (AKA, Curse of the Demon.)

Like Curse of the Demon films atmosphere benefits from its impressive art direction and cinematography. The lighting often accentuates that state of dread and the well places architectural designs of the school often add to a subtle sense of foreboding.

Image
Also, the bird might eat him.

In a bit of a twist from the standard horror movie formula we have a story where a man is terrorized by women, instead of the other way around, a bit of a flip-flop from the genres traditional gender roles. Although, this is a film from the early 60’s, so while the genres traditional gender roles may be swapped, the gender roles of the 1960 are still firmly in place.

Image
That’s right, I said burn that spider jar. You must give in to my irrational and possibly psychologically scarring demands.
My tight shirt deems it so.


As far as the characters go, the movie is well acted, though reflective of the times. Peter Wyngarde, as Norman, is a likeable enough protagonist by the end, but his initial pompous attitude and steadfast certainty takes him a while to warm up to. There were two things that bothered me, though.

The first was his reaction to Tansy’s charms. What she had really amounted to nothing more than if someone had a lucky rabbit’s foot or hanging a religious symbol around ones neck. I understood his initial reaction of her using these things without his knowledge, but having her burn everything like that so suddenly seemed a bit odd even by 1960’s psychology standards.

The second small point is that I found his character a little too…composed as the events played out. Some gradual inkling of dread my have worked better here. I know I would have at least shown some concern if something started constantly calling the house in the middle of the night.

Janet Blair, as his wife Tansy, comes across as earnest, believable and, when appropriate, frantic. There are a couple of instances that verge on ‘overacting’, but it's not enough to be too distracting.

But it is Margaret Johnston, who plays Flora, who probably pulls off the best performance. She’s cunning, subtly manipulative and sinister all rolled into one. And she manages to pull it off with style, even while sporting a pronounced limp.

Image
This scene in particular is excellent, creepy and intense. But as the flames got bigger that small, rational
part of my brain kept screaming “FIRE HAZARD!” I hate that part of my brain sometimes.


Burn, Witch, Burn! was based on Fritz Leiber's Conjure Wife, first published in 1943. The original New England setting was switched out for a rural British one for the Night of the Eagle movie adaptation. The films Weird Woman and Witches' Brew were also loosely based on Conjure Wife, though Witches' Brew follows Burn, Witch, Burn! more closely, plot-wise.



In the end, Burn, Witch, Burn! is an impressive British occult chiller which bears several similarities to Curse of the Demon. The excellent atmosphere hiding the unknown, yet tangible presence of evil keeps the suspense running at a constant hum, thought he film may be to predictable and tame by today’s standards. It’s slow start and subtlety may also turn away people who are looking for something a little more exciting. If you enjoy films focusing around the occult and building tension, than look further into Burn, Witch, Burn!. But if you like your horror movies with a bit more action, than this is not the film for you.

As far as I can tell, this is not currently streaming on Netflix.


Let the month of October begin :twisted:
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Luke »

DON JON

DON JON is a garage sale of self analyses, humor, sex, and homages. Luckily, it sells.

Although it certainly isn't my pick for a date movie, I would say without a doubt it is fun and entertaining. The social commentary is there as much as it is in SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER, meaning it's obvious and not shoved down your throat.

For his first writing/directing/starring venture, JGL does not fall flat. I was quite impressed with the end product, and although it has flaws it's still a solid movie. I would recommend giving it a watch if the trailer was to your interest, and would highly recommend seeing this with your parents if they once embarrassed you in public.
User avatar
BogusMeatFactory
Next-Gen
Posts: 6770
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:16 pm
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by BogusMeatFactory »

Luke wrote:DON JON

DON JON is a garage sale of self analyses, humor, sex, and homages. Luckily, it sells.

Although it certainly isn't my pick for a date movie, I would say without a doubt it is fun and entertaining. The social commentary is there as much as it is in SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER, meaning it's obvious and not shoved down your throat.

For his first writing/directing/starring venture, JGL does not fall flat. I was quite impressed with the end product, and although it has flaws it's still a solid movie. I would recommend giving it a watch if the trailer was to your interest, and would highly recommend seeing this with your parents if they once embarrassed you in public.
I am glad to hear some positive reviews of the movie. The trailer looked a little meh, but Joseph gordon-Levitt... or Jo-Go as my wife and I call him is always solid in everything he plays. Will probably wait until it is out on DVD to check it out.
Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Luke »

BogusMeatFactory wrote: I am glad to hear some positive reviews of the movie. The trailer looked a little meh, but Joseph gordon-Levitt... or Jo-Go as my wife and I call him is always solid in everything he plays. Will probably wait until it is out on DVD to check it out.

The family interaction scenes are hilarious.

Huh. Looks like it got an 81% on the tomatometer. Not too shabby.



edit* Finally:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/0 ... ertainment
User avatar
BogusMeatFactory
Next-Gen
Posts: 6770
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:16 pm
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by BogusMeatFactory »

I love it when people own up to their mistakes. We need more of that in the world. Now if only we could get a public apology from Michael Bay for the Transformers movies and George Lucas for the clusterfuck CGI in the prequels.
Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by TSTR »

BogusMeatFactory wrote:
I love it when people own up to their mistakes. We need more of that in the world. Now if only we could get a public apology from Michael Bay for the Transformers movies and George Lucas for the clusterfuck CGI in the prequels.
I think there's a lot more to answer for in that movie than just lens flares.
User avatar
Stark
Next-Gen
Posts: 9585
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:43 pm
Location: Wylie, TX

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by Stark »

TSTR wrote:I think there's a lot more to answer for in that movie than just lens flares.
You're right, it needed more Alice Eve in her underwear.
Let strength be granted, so the world might be mended...so the world might be mended.
User avatar
TSTR
Next-Gen
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: What was the last movie you've seen?

Post by TSTR »

Stark wrote:
TSTR wrote:I think there's a lot more to answer for in that movie than just lens flares.
You're right, it needed more Alice Eve in her underwear.
I'd take that over them even attempting to touch the whole Khan thing. 2 hours of Dr. Marcus 2.0 prancing about nearly naked would be fine by me.
Post Reply