racketboy.com

dsheinem wrote:

chilimac wrote: when a man becomes angry it is only natural for him to become violent, and now instead of the woman finally learning a lesson she should have learned a long time ago, the man is arrested and thrown into a cage. Now the lesson is for the man, and the lesson he learns is that it's best to become tolerant and submissive unless he wants more punishment. It's self-imposed psychological castration, and it's disgusting.

You are an idiot or a troll. In either case, please leave this site/community as you've pretty much managed to become the site's largest asshole in less than a week. Your "knowledge" of gender and sexuality is rooted in NOTHING that approaches any of the respected contemporary scientific, social scientific, philosophical, or other ways of researching/thinking about/understating how the world works. You are ignorance incarnate clinging to superstition and stereotypes as the basis for your "arguments". So fuck off.

(See, I am able to be angry without being violent!)

I see now why you're a "former" mod. You like to throw out insults towards people who say things you don't agree with. For someone who claims he can get angry without being violent, you sure need to learn how to be a bit more tolerant. You also like acting high and mighty and you think you already know everything because you read something once. You need to get your head out of your ass.

I don't give a damn what scientists think about how sexuality works. Why would I listen to what a bunch of castrated nerds have to say about sexuality? I don't listen to castrated losers. I listen to my balls, because they are what make a man a man.

Do you see how weak men have become? Now, if you act like a manly man, even other men think there's something psychologically wrong with you and that you need to be locked away. You know what it is? It's brainwash. The woman has brainwashed men into thinking this way, and now that men have weakened over the many years due having adapted to the controlled and safe civilized life, they now lack the nuts to overcome that brainwash.

chilimac wrote:

dsheinem wrote:

chilimac wrote: when a man becomes angry it is only natural for him to become violent, and now instead of the woman finally learning a lesson she should have learned a long time ago, the man is arrested and thrown into a cage. Now the lesson is for the man, and the lesson he learns is that it's best to become tolerant and submissive unless he wants more punishment. It's self-imposed psychological castration, and it's disgusting.

You are an idiot or a troll. In either case, please leave this site/community as you've pretty much managed to become the site's largest asshole in less than a week. Your "knowledge" of gender and sexuality is rooted in NOTHING that approaches any of the respected contemporary scientific, social scientific, philosophical, or other ways of researching/thinking about/understating how the world works. You are ignorance incarnate clinging to superstition and stereotypes as the basis for your "arguments". So fuck off.

(See, I am able to be angry without being violent!)

I see now why you're a "former" mod. You like to throw out insults towards people who say things you don't agree with. For someone who claims he can get angry without being violent, you sure need to learn how to be a bit more tolerant. You also like acting high and mighty and you think you already know everything because you read something once. You need to get your head out of your ass.

I don't give a damn what scientists think about how sexuality works. Why would I listen to what a bunch of castrated nerds have to say about sexuality? I don't listen to castrated losers. I listen to my balls, because they are what make a man a man.

Do you see how weak men have become? Now, if you act like a manly man, even other men think there's something psychologically wrong with you and that you need to be locked away. You know what it is? It's brainwash. The woman has brainwashed men into thinking this way, and now that men have weakened over the many years due having adapted to the controlled and safe civilized life, they now lack the nuts to overcome that brainwash.

I'm not tolerant of positions like yours that are used rationalize or advocate for domestic violence (perpetuated by men or women). I've done more than "read something once" about gender and sexuality, but that's not entirely relevant as it isn't about me and you as much as it is about the "logic" you are suggesting.

The fact that you want to dismiss science and "listen to your balls" is at least an honest statement of the strength of your argument and one that isn't masquerading as anything more than macho ramblings. Protip: in a medium governed by the use of language and in a forum where people usually try to argue intelligently, your ball-juice-generated brain waves aren't going to score any points. That's why you may as well just see yourself off.

dsheinem wrote:I'm not tolerant of positions like yours that are used rationalize or advocate for domestic violence (perpetuated by men or women). I've done more than "read something once" about gender and sexuality, but that's not entirely relevant as it isn't about me and you as much as it is about the "logic" you are suggesting.

The fact that you want to dismiss science and "listen to your balls" is at least an honest statement of the strength of your argument and one that isn't masquerading as anything more than macho ramblings. Protip: in a medium governed by the use of language and in a forum where people usually try to argue intelligently, your ball-juice-generated brain waves aren't going to score any points. That's why you may as well just see yourself off.

Make no mistake about it, I know I'll have a very short life here, because I don't get along well with weakness.

chilimac wrote:

dsheinem wrote:I'm not tolerant of positions like yours that are used rationalize or advocate for domestic violence (perpetuated by men or women). I've done more than "read something once" about gender and sexuality, but that's not entirely relevant as it isn't about me and you as much as it is about the "logic" you are suggesting.

The fact that you want to dismiss science and "listen to your balls" is at least an honest statement of the strength of your argument and one that isn't masquerading as anything more than macho ramblings. Protip: in a medium governed by the use of language and in a forum where people usually try to argue intelligently, your ball-juice-generated brain waves aren't going to score any points. That's why you may as well just see yourself off.

Make no mistake about it, I know I'll have a very short life here, because I don't get along well with weakness.

?

dsheinem wrote:



?

He does kinda remind me of Inazuma, though I can't imagine him ever taking up this particular viewpoint.

Oh man, if I believed in reincarnation I'd wish for dipshit to be reborn as a praying mantis, a black widow, or maybe a spotted hyena.

And the offender has been dealt with. We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.

He's toast eh? Well it was hilarious while it lasted.

If my balls could talk, I wonder what they would say?

CFFJR wrote:If my balls could talk, I wonder what they would say?

"It's hot in here, let us out." ?

noiseredux wrote:

CFFJR wrote:If my balls could talk, I wonder what they would say?

"It's hot in here, let us out." ?

done and done.

Now I'm slightly disturbed. What exactly would they want out of?