Moore was definitely my favorite when I was young. I guess I really don't have a favorite these days though.marurun wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 9:24 am My favorite Bond, however, is Moore, and though people complain about how camp his 007 films are, the later Brosnan films are just as campy in their own way and I enjoy them less. My favorite Moore film is probably Live and Let Die. There's an argument to be made that it's actually not a very good Bond film, but Jane Seymour is such a stunner and the action sequences are fun and frenetic. Also, I really like the strong debt the film owes to the Blaxploitation genre. For Your Eyes Only and The Spy Who Loved Me are also good picks. FYEO is a little more down-to-earth and TSWLM is action-packed and over the top without all the genre camp of Live and Let Die.
I love ALL of the Roger Moore movies, even the ones that people bag on.
Live and Let Die and The Man With The Golden Gun I like to give a little bit of a pass to because they were still trying to figure out how Roger Moore would be James Bond. The George Lazenby experiment was kind of a shit show in many ways, Roger Moore was really the first true time they were trying to get a new Bond actor up and running. It took some figuring out. People like to point out the scene in Golden Gun when Bond roughs up a women for information, as if they were trying to make him more of a brute like Connery was but it just fails because Moore is more of a puppy dog. It's like trying to shove a square peg through a round hole.
The Spy Who Loved Me is definitely when Moore came into his own as Bond, and it helps that it's a pretty solid movie anyway. Just about the only thing I don't like is that Barbara Bach isn't so believable as a Russian operative. And the main villain is sort of forgettable. Maybe due to a lack of screen time or having any interesting traits or anything memorable. Or maybe because JAWS is so freaking awesome that I don't care LOL.
Moonraker is like they took TSWLM formula because it worked and injected some Star Wars into it. I already mentioned my thoughts on it above, but yeah, it's not nearly as bad as some people make it out to be.
For Your Eyes Only is "down to Earth" literally after Moonraker. They very intentionally made a less fantastical movie. So no world domination plot, or hold the world for ransom or whatever. It's definitely Moore's most "real" movie, and I love it for what it is. I didn't know until recently that a LOT of this movie is straight from Flemming's short stories.
Octopussy is kind of a mess, if I'm being honest, but I still think it's a solid Bond flick. The worst part about it is that the plot is sort of all over the place, and as many times as I've seen it the plot is still hard to remember. But purely for a spectacle, it's not at all a bad movie. It has some really great action sequences. And the pre credit sequence might actually be one of the best.
A View To A Kill was actually my favorite Moore Bond film when I was a kid, and it probably still is. The thing people hate about this movie is that Moore was really too old to be playing Bond but they went with it anyway. But you know, I never really noticed that when I use to watch the movie on VHS. I mean, I knew he looked older than he did in Live and Let Die. But it wasn't until DVD and really Blu Ray that I realized just how old he really looks. And the joke, Moore is the occasional stand in for a stunt man is kinda true LOL. But I still love the movie anyway. Christopher Walken and Grace Jones are awesome.