NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams Screenshots from Sega

Post by **racketboy** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:04 pm

Box art:
http://kotaku.com/gaming/wake-up/nights ... 292930.php

Post by **dragonsho** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:51 am

Is it just me or does Nights look a bit feminine? (I always thought nights was a guy)

That's cool about the wi-fi but honestly, I do not enjoy Nintendo's online service. It's just so clunky and there's no mics. This could easily change though.

Post by **tHePhAnToM!??!** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:54 am

Wow with feet like that one could easily assume that there are afterburners in ther and nights is a fucking liar. Dam the those fairy pervs.

Post by **racketboy** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:40 am

dragonsho wrote:Is it just me or does Nights look a bit feminine? (I always thought nights was a guy)

That's cool about the wi-fi but honestly, I do not enjoy Nintendo's online service. It's just so clunky and there's no mics. This could easily change though.

I think NiGHTS is gender-neutral or whatever you wanna call it.

Post by **tHePhAnToM!??!** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:42 am

i guess we will just say asexual???

Post by **racketboy** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:16 am

Phone-cam clip:
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/08/30/today ... ecam-clip/
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/user ... 99939.html

Post by **opethfan** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:08 pm

tHePhAnToM!??! wrote:i guess we will just say asexual???

Androgynous is the term you want. A-sexual means without sex, and generally refers to reproduction, such as the way amoeba reproduce.

Post by **tHePhAnToM!??!** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:01 am

dammit i was trying to have some perverted locker room fun not to get all technical. If i want technical i will just ask you next time. lol.

Post by **opethfan** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:34 am

tHePhAnToM!??! wrote:dammit i was trying to have some perverted locker room fun not to get all technical. If i want technical i will just ask you next time. lol.

Asexual = not having sex
not having sex != fun.

Plus, all perverted locker room fun is sexual, hence the 'perverted'

...Oh crap, I went technical again.

Post by **samratty** » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:16 am

Mozgus wrote:Why is everyone on other forums trashing this game based on graphics? Hell, I think it looks damn good. It will probably turn out to be a mediocre game, but hey, be fair; it's not visually ugly.

Maybe it's just me being a cynic but it's probably due to the whole anti-wii thing a lot of the mainstream 'hardcore' gamers are going through now.

Personally I think it looks really really nice. If it's exactly the same gameplaywise as the original just with new interesting levels I'd be happy.