Random Gaming Thoughts

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Exhuminator »

RCBH928 wrote:I wonder what Sony did to get so much support
They treated third party developers with respect and offered a low financial barrier to entry on their new platform.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
User avatar
pepharytheworm
Next-Gen
Posts: 2853
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by pepharytheworm »

Exhuminator wrote:
RCBH928 wrote:I wonder what Sony did to get so much support
They treated third party developers with respect and offered a low financial barrier to entry on their new platform.
In other words they ate the cost and the Playstation brand functioned at a loss for many years.
Where's my chippy? There's my chippy.
User avatar
the7k
Next-Gen
Posts: 4313
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:48 am

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by the7k »

Nintendo had pissed off a lot of companies with their BS back in those days. They were perfectly ready to hop off. Add to that the N64 going cartridge format which limited devs ability to do certain things (video cut scenes, higher quality audio) as well as increased the price of manufacturing games compared to CDs, it was just the perfect time for third parties to leave Nintendo behind.
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Exhuminator »

pepharytheworm wrote:the Playstation brand functioned at a loss for many years
I know this was true for the beginning of the PS2 era. But was the PS1 era also unprofitable for the company? I had read that in the year 2000, 70% of the company's profits were coming from its gaming division.

As for the PS1 era and third parties; Sony offered profit-sharing arrangements for third parties, as well as tons of developer tools, the possibility of mature rated games to target an older demographic not being courted by Nintendo, and all the benefits of the CD-ROM format. These were important factors in attracting third party developers to their platform versus the N64.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
Kidpanda
64-bit
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:52 pm
Location: Panda Island™

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Kidpanda »

Nintendo flat out pissed the two companies that held the OG rights for CDs. Sony and Philips? Yea, you're not using any optical media guys till Panasonic comes along and creates the mini DVD standard. Hell, they couldn't even get DVDs back during the GC era...same people owned the rights to that too. Nintendo really shot themselves in the foot.
Image
RyaNtheSlayA
Next-Gen
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Denver CO, USA

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by RyaNtheSlayA »

If I haven't played Mass Effect 1 and 2 can I jump into 3 and have a good time with it?
Older. Not wiser.
User avatar
BogusMeatFactory
Next-Gen
Posts: 6770
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:16 pm
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Contact:

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by BogusMeatFactory »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:If I haven't played Mass Effect 1 and 2 can I jump into 3 and have a good time with it?
The wii u version has a big synopsis of the other 2 games and asks you the big decisions that shape the game. If you are not playing on the wii u then you need to play the first two. Still think playing the first two would be a good idea.
Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.
User avatar
Sload Soap
Next-Gen
Posts: 2105
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:43 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Sload Soap »

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:If I haven't played Mass Effect 1 and 2 can I jump into 3 and have a good time with it?
I wouldn't myself. ME3 starts kind of in media res and a lot of the story points will be close to meaningless for someone unfamiliar with the previous games. You might also get a nasty shock should you want to go back to Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 by how differently (read: worse) the combat feels.

To be sure you'd have a good time though as ME3 is still a blast gameplay wise. It's just you might spend a lot of time being confused and disconnected from a decent amount of the story and it is a very story driven series.

Put it this way: would you watch Return of the Jedi first?
User avatar
Gunstar Green
Next-Gen
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Gunstar Green »

Exhuminator wrote:If you're interested in a new Mega Man Legends game, this is about as close as we're going to get for a while:

Not feeling this one. Most people who wanted Legends 3 wanted to see the conclusion of that story not an alternate dimension reboot. Stuff like Mighty No. 9 and Bloodstained work because those expy characters are perfectly fine stand-ins since the games they're copying weren't really about story.

It's also bad timing, I think people are fatigued by all these high-profile gaming Kickstarters recently. It's also puzzling that they're doing it before Mighty No. 9 is out since surely a completed, released product would give people more confidence to back future projects.

Unless Mighty No. 9 is going to be terrible and they want the money in advance of that fallout. I do have to say I'm feeling a little anxious, none of the gameplay videos have really impressed me.
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22574
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Random Gaming Thoughts

Post by Ack »

Gunstar Green wrote:Unless Mighty No. 9 is going to be terrible and they want the money in advance of that fallout. I do have to say I'm feeling a little anxious, none of the gameplay videos have really impressed me.
I've played the demo, and it does play like classic Mega Man to me. I don't think you should be too worried.
Image
Post Reply