Wii-U thoughts so far

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
Post Reply

Wii-U

I'm in for one
120
43%
Maybe later
96
35%
Not interested
45
16%
Undecided
16
6%
 
Total votes: 277
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Ack »

dsheinem wrote:I've made the argument that no system has a higher percentage of non-shitty games than than 32X.
Right, right.
Image
Top
AppleQueso

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by AppleQueso »

dsheinem wrote: I've made the argument that no system has a higher percentage of non-shitty games than than 32X.
What about the supergrafx?
Top
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:
Contact Exhuminator

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Exhuminator »

dsheinem wrote:I've made the argument that no system has a higher percentage of non-shitty games than the Neo Geo.
Fixed that for you.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
Top
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:
Contact dsheinem

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by dsheinem »

AppleQueso wrote: What about the supergrafx?
Exhuminator wrote:
dsheinem wrote:I've made the argument that no system has a higher percentage of non-shitty games than the Neo Geo.
Fixed that for you.
hmm, interesting counter-arguments
Top
User avatar
BoneSnapDeez
Next-Gen
Posts: 20148
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:08 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by BoneSnapDeez »

Neo Geo is alright. I think the price of games + collector's market has inflated opinions some. There is a good deal of decent games, but so many fighters that just feel interchangeable.

I will agree with Apple though. 100% of the SuperGrafx library is quality.
http://www.rfgeneration.com/cgi-bin/search.pl
Top
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:
Contact Exhuminator

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Exhuminator »

BoneSnapDeez wrote:There is a good deal of decent games, but so many fighters that just feel interchangeable.
The genres might be skewed but the quality stays consistent. I've never personally played a Neo Geo game that I thought outright sucked.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
Top
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Jmustang1968 »

Neo geo library is so narrow though. Fighters and shmups with a few beatemups and platformers mixed in.
Top
Tanooki
Next-Gen
Posts: 6947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:06 pm

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Tanooki »

It may be limited, the fighters many may be interchangeable, but it doesn't change the argument it's hard to find a really bad game on there. But it is also safe to say that they probably QC'd stuff to a lot higher degree since it was an arcade system primary with a home counterpart so they needed to qualify them to nitpicky quarter droppers and deep pocketed types who bought the home carts for hundreds of dollars.


...and yes all 6 supergrafx games were solid.
Top
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Ack »

So all of you guys really like Legend of Success Joe, Operation Ragnagard, and The Super Spy, eh?
Image
Top
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am
Contact:
Contact Exhuminator

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Exhuminator »

Jmustang1968 wrote:Neo geo library is so narrow though. Fighters and shmups with a few beatemups and platformers mixed in.
Neo Geo also had puzzle and sports games. And that is more variety than the SuperGrafx with its two whole genres of platforming and shooting.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Nintendo”