mjmjr25 wrote:A repeat offender of...smoking weed

Let's not compare smoking to beating your kids in "the whooping room".
The main problem with your statement is "tends" and "usually". That's the problem and why for once jvalentine is right; there is no consistency the way teams or the NFL handle suspensions.
There are plenty of players who've been accused of less and have been suspended or outright cut, including by these very Vikings, unfortunately for them, none of them run with a ball like Adrian Peterson.
NFL has(had) strict policies in place for substance offenses. So those are easy to follow as they have clear guidelines and are in the CBA. The NFL self administers substance issues as they conduct the testing.
Off field behavior and legal issues are another matter as every case is unique. The NFL tries to respond to the decisions of the legal system. They try to weigh the amount of evidence, criminal conviction, past offenses (if any), etc... These are more judgement calls.
I say tends to and usually because in some cases, even a first time offense levies a hefty response. AP may get a suspension, but they are letting the legal system play out first which is par for the course. Jumping on the AP is off the hook bandwagon is premature.
NFL discipline and team discipline are different and mostly independent. A team chooses to cut the player or not while the NFL levies suspensions. Obviously a problem player who isnt a starter or very productive will have a shorter leash with a team. The NFL hands out suspensions regardless of talent. You think the NFL wanted to suspend the leading receiver last season for the entire season? They arent necessarily reluctant to punishing AP, they just arent in a position yet to pass judgement.
I am not defending the NFL so much as explaining it. I dont think the NFL should care as much if guys smoke weed, but mainly should test for PEDs. I am actually pro legalization of it.
And the thing with Best Buy has no relevance to this discussion.