Cronozilla wrote:Not only is it bad (And reviews lampooned it), it's based on a board game.
If they made Uno The Movie, it would do badly also. It's not even a new thing, when they made Clue the movie, it also performed badly.
If you think that movie has no depth, you don't know what you're talking about.
.
I have not seen the movie but merely stating it doesnt look so bad, there seems to be some effort put into it.
As for The Matrix, I do not care if it has deep philosophical meaning. The plot is clear, AI took over humans and now they are using the humans to their advantage while our race is living in fantasy, and its up to few to fight back the "aliens" . This is much better than watching Magnolia , I believe it was, with raining frogs. Frogs are raining in the middle of a modern city, now how are you supposed to know what is this.
A lot of stuff is not explain but it does not have to be explained to enjoy the movie, and this is another part which there is a huge clash of cultures. It seems in the west they love to keep things unexplained, where my part of the world would see unexplained creative work as incomplete or lacking, like a story with no ending. I still do not know what the oracle is.
As for the French articles, I never understood why movie makers put extra effort to include such details into a movie that like 1% of the viewers will notice and if they do they will not even research it. Last I checked, people watch movies for entertainment, not to study them.
@SamsonLongHair
Well, then I guess we shouldn't care about who are the producers for any movie because it does not affect us as viewers, so when they say "Produced by Steven Spielberg" in reality it mean "Spielberg was responsible to make this movie profitable for the investors" , why should I care?
I always thought that a producer at least put the over-all direction and quality level of the movie, while the director worked on the details... at least.