Aramonde wrote:
emwearz wrote:
This water thin argument about Windows 8 annoys me to no end, I bought it not long after it came out and NEVER use Metro. Ever.
It is so easy to disable and replace with a Start Menu
How?
Classic Shell, the software you just linked to.
Most valid complaints people have with the OS is with its UI, not its performance (which can't be complained about because it is solid). Pretty much every UI complain people have can be fixed in someway.
I use Metro (I don't boot to it, I boot to the desktop) a hell of a lot more than I ever used the Start menu.
Windows 8 is just as stable as Windows 7, has a lower memory footprint, fast load times (if your using EFI firmware),
The UI is the big difference, you have to learn how to use it, but once you do learn, I personally find it more enjoyable to have a fully customized metro screen. I did not like it at first, but I use it a hell of a lot more than I ever used the start button (which I only used for the search feature).
If you just want to install an OS an run with it, go with 7, if you want to install an OS and don't mind tweaking it out a bit, disabling things you don't use and customizing the OS for a bit, Windows 8 is the better OS.
My 2c, but I don't really need to justify why I use it. I had Windows 7 installed from launch and loved it up until I installed Windows 8. It is a great OS, but Windows 8 is an upgrade, not just a new release.
Everytime a new OS comes out people complain out there ass about it, it took XP years to get the reputation it got, when it launched people hated it because of the high resources it used and lowered gaming performance. Windows 8 does the opposite but changes the UI, which can be custmized more than other releases and people kick still kick up a shit storm.