AppleQueso wrote:What the hell are you talking about? Who the hell are these "Islam-defending liberal atheists" you keep ranting about?
Many leftists in Europe.
The political system in America is different so European point of view does not apply when talking about America and American point of view does not apply when talking about Europe. To my knowledge there aren't any cars being burned or neighborhoods where the police or firemen wont enter in America so the situation is obviously different there.
AppleQueso wrote:Chances are, if you see an atheist talking about "islamophobia" they're talking about the former.
The context where I usually see that word is when discussing about immigration politics. When that is the case, my point remains: if you're a liberal atheist, you should oppose mass scale muslim integration to Europe. That doesn't mean that muslims should be barred from immigrating to Europe or that they should be treated differently when moving to Europe. Again, mass scale immigration is not the same thing as all immigration. And again, this has nothing to do with discrimination.
oxymoron wrote:
If he was saying that then there was no need to say 'worst'. That implies that defending Islam is worse than defending Christianity.
Because from a liberal atheist point of view, it is. Everything that they criticize christianity for, islam does it worse. That doesn't mean that things have always been that way (like I pointed out, in the middle ages it was Christianity that was bringing forth the dark ages in Europe, while the Muslim world was much more advanced), or that things will have to be the same way in the future, but here and now, not only is the Christian world more prosperous and stable than the Islamic world, it's much more liberal and "humane". That doesn't mean that there wouldn't be some conservative Christian countries left, or some moderate muslim countries, but when you look at the big picture, Christian countries are far more tolerant and liberal.