Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female characters

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else

Should there be more ugly female characters and fewer attractive female chracters in video games?

Yes there should be
9
28%
No there shouldn't be
16
50%
Undecided
7
22%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by Jmustang1968 »

dsheinem wrote:
Jmustang1968 wrote:Mods need to censor th dictonary arguments.
^ good example of censurship
Not if they delete the posts.
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by Erik_Twice »

AppleQueso wrote:This is a good thread derail.
It had been a good while since we last argued about semantics.
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
User avatar
Gunstar Green
Next-Gen
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by Gunstar Green »

Semantics are always the most sure fire way to crash a discussion :lol: .
AppleQueso

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by AppleQueso »

Gunstar Green wrote:Semantics are always the most sure fire way to crash a discussion :lol: .
Dude, the smiley goes after the period.
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by irixith »

AppleQueso wrote:
Gunstar Green wrote:Semantics are always the most sure fire way to crash a discussion :lol: .
Dude, the smiley goes after the period.
...and isn't it "sure-fire", not "sure fire"?
...and while I'm at it, there must be something wrong with "always", "the most" and "sure-fire" in the same sentence. :lol:
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by Luke »

AppleQueso wrote: Dude, the smiley goes after the period.
You've also had a pregnancy scare?


wocka wocka wocka
fvgazi
Next-Gen
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Long Island NY

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by fvgazi »

Luke wrote:
AppleQueso wrote: Dude, the smiley goes after the period.
You've also had a pregnancy scare?


wocka wocka wocka
It wasn't scary if they were smiling. :P
[ XBL: downedcity | PSN: biggry | Steam: Merchandise ]
Black Lodge Amplification: http://blacklodgeamps.tumblr.com/
Image
Hatta
Next-Gen
Posts: 4030
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:33 pm

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by Hatta »

Well I got the joke, Luke.
We are prepared to live in the plain and die in the plain!
JayJaySut
16-bit
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 5:15 pm

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by JayJaySut »

...and while I'm at it, there must be something wrong with "always", "the most" and "sure-fire" in the same sentence.
You forgot to add a comma after "the most".
User avatar
irixith
Next-Gen
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:22 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Solving sexism in games: Fat/ugly human female character

Post by irixith »

JayJaySut wrote:
...and while I'm at it, there must be something wrong with "always", "the most" and "sure-fire" in the same sentence.
You forgot to add a comma after "the most".
I left out the serial comma just to spark a grammar argument. :mrgreen:
Post Reply