Problem is, even then we don't simply lock them up and throw away the key. He'll still receive hearings and legal services, a mandatory minimum level of health and psych care, as well as the other minimum requirements of penal care. If he continues his religious path, he may also help convert and radicalize other prisoners who will be getting out. Admittedly though, an angry general population might also decide to take him out on there own, especially if he does something stupid.prfsnl_gmr wrote:Personally, I think that prosecuting death penalty cases is too expensive and permits the defendant too many appeals. Life w/o parole is much less expensive, and there is a much lower chance that the sentence and verdict will be overturned on appeal. (There will also be far fewer appeals.) In my opinion, we have already wasted enough resources on this despicable person; so, I hope that they simply lock him up and throw away the key.
As for Luke's comment, it's not that I want revenge. It's that I consider his crimes too horrific to be allowed the possibility of returning to a normal life. I don't see the death penalty as a means for punishing someone but instead to ensure they cannot get out and commit further crimes. If prison is there to attempt reforming individuals, the death penalty is for those who cannot be reformed or have done things so horrible that there is no point in trying.
