dsheinem wrote:pierrot wrote:^Don't want to put words in anyone's mouth, but I believe he's drawing some comparisons between those gaming climates and that of today's in order to show a trend that could potentially lead to another similar scenario.
Again, the crash of the late 70s was not analogous to the crash of the early 80s was not analagous to the death of 3DO, Jaguar, etc. was not analagous to the death of Sega as a hardware manufacturer, etc. In each case there were myriad economic realities that made the situation unique. Trying to draw analogies between any of those eras and the one we're in right now is not only a misappropriation of history, but also a misunderstanding of the current industry's economics.
I don't entirely agree or disagree with anything stated, but even from your post in the other thread, the downward sloping trend of physical retail sales does nothing to discredit the idea that the modern console market is potentially hazardous, fiscally, for those in the market or who would try to enter the market. I don't believe that there's anything that says another crash would be eventual, but the climate does appear to be less stable.
DinnerX wrote:Are you saying that even though the environment is different it doesn't mean the outcome is likely to be different? That doesn't make any sense.SirPsycho wrote:Just because the environment is different does not make the results or potential any less likely to happen.
Again, not to put words in anyone's mouth, but it appears to me that SirPsycho is saying that you can't deem a crash entirely impossible simply because the environments are different.