Racketboy Political Discussion Thread
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
I'm going to miss your elections :'( . Your politicians are so funny...
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
-
ninjainspandex
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 4574
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: Hartland Wisconsin
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
enjoyZeroAX wrote:I'm going to miss your elections :'( . Your politicians are so funny...

-
DinnerX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
- Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
Yeah, that's true. I did wait to see just how big things would get, but I wasn't expecting much.MrPopo wrote:Right, but in your case you knew going in that you weren't going to be happy with him (as the general Dem platform is larger government). So Obama didn't let you down. Dave's point was to say that Obama let you down when you gave him a shot is probably not accurate.DinnerX wrote:Props for honesty of course, but I'm a small government guy. A lot of that list was aid this, increase that, provide incentives here, expand this, etc. That's a large part of why I didn't like him.
Shoot. So I guess I've been wasting all this time trying to beat Battletoads then.BoringSupreez wrote:I'm not saying it's something you can't get over, but becoming the POTUS is probably the highest achievement possible on earth at the moment.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
Another random fact: According to the 28th Amendment, beating Battletoads is a requirement for the presidency. The only way Bush Jr. got the job was because he "beat" the game (but we all know that Jeb Bush got him through it).DinnerX wrote:Shoot. So I guess I've been wasting all this time trying to beat Battletoads then.BoringSupreez wrote:I'm not saying it's something you can't get over, but becoming the POTUS is probably the highest achievement possible on earth at the moment.
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
Re: Gaza.
We all do understand that women are seen differently in the Middle East right? Yes, Clinton is the Secretary of State, but I wonder what impact she'll make when she may be thought of as a second class citizen.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
We all do understand that women are seen differently in the Middle East right? Yes, Clinton is the Secretary of State, but I wonder what impact she'll make when she may be thought of as a second class citizen.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
-
puke_face
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.puke_face wrote:That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.
Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.BoringSupreez wrote:I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.puke_face wrote:That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.
Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
That would be nice, but I just don't see it happening.dsheinem wrote:I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.BoringSupreez wrote:I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.
Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.
Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
Anyway, I think it's time I change the name of this thread (and end the poll
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?
Go rub a lamp.dsheinem wrote: I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.