Racketboy Political Discussion Thread

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean

Who are you voting for president?

Poll ended at Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:11 pm

Barack Obama
43
44%
Mitt Romney
15
15%
Third party
14
14%
Abstaining from voting for president
14
14%
Not allowed to vote (non-US citizen, criminal record, not 18)
12
12%
 
Total votes: 98

User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by ZeroAX »

I'm going to miss your elections :'( . Your politicians are so funny...
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
ninjainspandex
Next-Gen
Posts: 4574
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: Hartland Wisconsin

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by ninjainspandex »

ZeroAX wrote:I'm going to miss your elections :'( . Your politicians are so funny...
enjoy
Image
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by DinnerX »

MrPopo wrote:
DinnerX wrote:Props for honesty of course, but I'm a small government guy. A lot of that list was aid this, increase that, provide incentives here, expand this, etc. That's a large part of why I didn't like him. :wink:
Right, but in your case you knew going in that you weren't going to be happy with him (as the general Dem platform is larger government). So Obama didn't let you down. Dave's point was to say that Obama let you down when you gave him a shot is probably not accurate.
Yeah, that's true. I did wait to see just how big things would get, but I wasn't expecting much.
BoringSupreez wrote:I'm not saying it's something you can't get over, but becoming the POTUS is probably the highest achievement possible on earth at the moment.
Shoot. So I guess I've been wasting all this time trying to beat Battletoads then.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by o.pwuaioc »

DinnerX wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:I'm not saying it's something you can't get over, but becoming the POTUS is probably the highest achievement possible on earth at the moment.
Shoot. So I guess I've been wasting all this time trying to beat Battletoads then.
Another random fact: According to the 28th Amendment, beating Battletoads is a requirement for the presidency. The only way Bush Jr. got the job was because he "beat" the game (but we all know that Jeb Bush got him through it).
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by Luke »

Re: Gaza.

We all do understand that women are seen differently in the Middle East right? Yes, Clinton is the Secretary of State, but I wonder what impact she'll make when she may be thought of as a second class citizen.

Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
puke_face

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by puke_face »

Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by BoringSupreez »

puke_face wrote:
Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.
I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.

Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.

Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by dsheinem »

BoringSupreez wrote:
puke_face wrote:
Luke wrote:Re: Gaza.
Sometimes I wish we'd but out of others affairs until the dust settles.
That's just not the 'Murican way, lol.
I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.

Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.

Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by BoringSupreez »

dsheinem wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:I know you were joking, but you're actually right. The stuff happening over in Israel is too delicate and too important for us not to involve ourselves.

Taking a smaller role on the international stage is appealing to a lot of people for obvious reasons, but history shows a nation our size just can't do so. It's like an oak trying to keep from towering over the rest of the trees.

Anyway, I'm hoping that things turn out the way they often have in the past: Israel invades, busts some heads, a truce is declared, things go back to normal for a while.
I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.
That would be nice, but I just don't see it happening.

Anyway, I think it's time I change the name of this thread (and end the poll :lol: ).
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Poll: who are you voting for this year?

Post by Luke »

dsheinem wrote: I would love to see Israel not invade, a truce to be worked out, and a two-state solution come about with no further bloodshed.
Go rub a lamp.
Post Reply