But the MSH SAT audio is of much worse audio quality than what is heard on MSH PSX. They both don't comapare to the arcade in this respect but Saturn versions sounds worse.Sound is going to be inferior on any CPS2 board due to the brilliance of Q-Sound. This has nothing to do with the port per se.
No they don't. Not in the arcade version. There is absolutely no slowdown with large characters on screen. The games frame rate never is ever really compromised from large characters being on screen.Hulk and Juggernaut slow down on the board as well, so that's what we call, arcade accurate.
Of course the DC port was the highest selling of the 3! It had a more significant print run over PS2, XB versions! Read my posts!Multiple platforms, so obviously we'd include the DC version, which was the highest selling, not sure why you'd point out the others and disregard the best seller
There has been ZERO affect on the DC price. It was selling steady $20-30 4 years ago, 2 years ago, and yup, same today.
["the PS2 and Xbox releases were well known to have a very limited print run due to the Capcom's loss of licensing and as a result garnered their high price and demand. These versions were more expensive than the superior DC port as a result"]
DC versions value has always remained steadily the same when compared to the crazy price hikes on the PS2 and XB version. There is more units of the game out there and less people who owned a DC at the time compared to the other 2.
While the other 2 version are inferior in quality compared to DC, Their value WAS based on its small print run and demand (more people had PS2s)
I'm not debating anything other than MVC2!
And like I said, It MAY be a possibility that MSH value will drop as a result of MVC origins. just like MVC2 on PS2 and XB when down to a more reasonable value when MVC2 came out as a download.
Well sad! but my findings aren't based on discussions but on what I personally have experienced though actual play. It would def be irresponsible to say MSH is a bad port if it was wasn't. But it's also irresponsible to say the game (MSH on SAT) is excellent port of the arcade or even a better port over the PSX port. The game isn't an excellent port. If it were an excellent port it would a near accurate port of the arcade version... it isn't. it's barely on the same ground as the PSX version and that version isn't an excellent port either.I take great care to say something is superior, because the reality is, people make decisions based on these discussions, and I think it is irresponsible for anyone to say MSH is bad port. It isn't.
I wouldn't say that especially regarding Alpha 2. Its a WAY more accurate port of the arcade when compared to MSH SAT and its respective arcade version. Furthermore Alpha 2 is a much more superior port over the PSX version of Alpha 2. This is not the case for MSH.If you said the SAT port of Alpha 1 / 2 had noticeable issues, i'd agree.
I'm not questioning the sales of MSH based on its accuracy issues over the arcade.Sometimes the port is horrendous and can still sell well - example, Gekirindan on SAT is miserable compared to the F3 board. That game has slowdown.



