I'm just saying, if you don't want to sound like a douchebag who thinks Obama is a secret Muslim and we faked the moon landing then you might consider evaluating how you convey information.Pulsar_t wrote:Fuck credibility, who cares about that with shit hitting the fan so obtusely? And yes it's lamestream with the sole purpose of obfuscating matters to serve vested interests. You don't need a PR degree to realise that, but it helps if you have oneMrPopo wrote:You do realize that regardless of the content of what you say, by using the phrase "lamestream" you immediately lose all credibility.Pulsar_t wrote:I don't get your analogy.. but here's more evidence that banks are little more than legalised mafias http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18930191
I mean these scandals certainly outstrip any events of the past decade, but it's all hush-hush over at the lamestream scum.
You'd also help your disposition if you stepped back and really asked how anything you read in the news actually effects you. Once you realize the world has been fucked since man first learned to use tools and this is all par for the course you'll be much happier.
