Your statements are very confusing!Alright, this is very odd now. I actually got a copy of RE3 for the dreamcast to compare with my gamecube game. I've asked may people about what GC version can do and they told me that it CAN render at 480p compressed and they actually feel the background for GC version is actually better too. About the only thing that prevents GC version from being perfect is the quality of the cut scenes (dreamcast had cutscenes that looked overblown), the two extra costumes, and vmu support. In the end, both dreamcast and gamecube and their pros and cons, so you really can't go wrong with either version.
Why ask others when you have both versions. Find out for yourself and report on your findings please. Backgrounds are better... than what, Dreamcast version?I actually got a copy of RE3 for the dreamcast to compare with my gamecube game. I've asked may people about what GC version can do and they told me that it CAN render at 480p compressed and they actually feel the background for GC version is actually better too
I thought this was put to rest. GCN version has better quality cutscenes as they are displayed at 60fps while the DC version's run at half the framerate (like on PS1), so this statement of yours is backwards.About the only thing that prevents GC version from being perfect is the quality of the cut scenes
This was already stated. Each one has something over the other so unless the GCN version of RE3 does support 480p, the DC version has better pros compared to its console rivals version of RE3.In the end, both dreamcast and gamecube and their pros and cons, so you really can't go wrong with either version