Being naked in "On the Road" doesn't hurt either.noiseredux wrote: word.
Please keep that shot in the movie Hollywood. Pretty Please.
Being naked in "On the Road" doesn't hurt either.noiseredux wrote: word.
haha. She's been in her underwear in every single movie I've seen her in. I feel like it's her signature.Luke wrote:Being naked in "On the Road" doesn't hurt either.noiseredux wrote: word.
Please keep that shot in the movie Hollywood. Pretty Please.
To each his own, and I'm not sure how the third point has any bearing here. If she can't be charismatic on the reel, I don't care what she's like on the tube.Luke wrote: She gorgeous, believable and an astonishing interview.

Who is also in "On the Road".Stark wrote: That would be Kristen Dunst...
I liked Panic Room! Or are you just saying you didn't like Stewart in Panic Room? I like Fincher movies for the most part though.sabrage wrote:Maybe it was just Panic Room, but I subsequently hated her in Into the Wild and Adventureland as well.
Did you see The Majestic, that wasn't too bad. Liked it.sabrage wrote:I was really hoping "that penguin movie" would be the final nail in the Carrey coffin. And I adore his serious acting! Give me Man on the Moon, Eternal Sunshine or Truman... But no, we get another Bruce Almighty.
I don't plan on seeing it for the same reason. The first trailer months ago looked cheesily awesome. Then I saw the later trailer at another movie recently that was all serious and ruined it.Luke wrote:ABRAHAM LINCOLN:VAMPIRE HUNTER
Totally wasn't what I was expecting. Expected a lot of camp, lots of laughs, but this movie takes itself too seriously. It is rarely fun or funny and the action sequences, although packed with gun-fu, are quite monotonous.
Not to say the movie lacks all appeal, but if you walk in the theater thinking you are about to see an hour and a half of laugh out loud intentional silliness, you'll be disappointed.
To be fair, there's precious few child actors that I enjoy (Stewart's issues were largely seperate from her $35 million "vapid, pouty and stoned" routine...) But I didn't like Panic Room much either.Stark wrote: I liked Panic Room! Or are you just saying you didn't like Stewart in Panic Room? I like Fincher movies for the most part though.
Did you see The Majestic, that wasn't too bad. Liked it.
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "never meet your hero", and interviews with actors are the same way. Ever watched an interview with Harrison Ford? The guy is a complete space case. Stewart, however, interviews very, very well.sabrage wrote: I'm not sure how the third point has any bearing here.
I was really hoping "that penguin movie" would be the final nail in the Carrey coffin. And I adore his serious acting! Give me Man on the Moon, Eternal Sunshine or Truman... But no, we get another Bruce Almighty.
Congratulations, you found a movie I hate even more than Dumb and Dumber.Luke wrote:Better than Tyson in the Hangover if ya ask me.
I think I just didn't like Rango himself. I found him a very off putting character. So every time they tried to do something funny with him I wasn't laughing. Every time I was supposed to root for him, I sort of didn't care. Dreamworks movies like How to Train Your Dragon and the Kung Fu Panda movies had characters I could easily get behind. Rango was just...annoying. The movie was great, but the main character wasn't. This is coming from a Johnny Depp fan. It's not anything against how he plays the character, just how the character's written. He's too weird and awkward, to the point of just not being likable I felt, and the comedy beats with him often just don't work because they are so forced and predictable. I'm gonna give it a second watch though to see if I feel differently, but I think the main character is just poorly handled. I actually enjoyed the female character more, with her funny "freeze" moments. Rango himself though, is borderline obnoxious. He's a lovable loser who actually isn't lovable at all..BoringSupreez wrote:I thought it was the best movie of it's type in years. Way better than anything Dreamworks has put out since Shrek 2.Gamerforlife wrote:Rango is a good movie, but for whatever reason I didn't get a lot of enjoyment out of it. I don't know if it's just me, or if there was just something off about this movie. I didn't get nearly as much enjoyment from it as I did movies like Despicable Me, Kung Fu Panda, How to Train your Dragon, and other similar types of movies. I may have to give it a second watch because I can't say why exactly I didn't love it, as it's certainly a well put together movie.
90 minutes of walking around? What movie were you watching?indecks wrote:Gamerforlife wrote: Monsters
I don't want to say too much about this movie. It's best to watch without any expectations. I'll just say if you like monster movies or British films, it's worth your time. Good movie for fans of JJ's movie Super 8 or Cloverfield
WHAT!?
Dude, no way. I know we all have opinions but this film is nowhere NEAR Super8 or Cloverfield. It was 90 minutes of walking around.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.