CRTGAMER wrote:
I have the 32 inch HD CRT of the one you are considering. ALL video connections have great sharp imagery. Just get the best type of cable connection that each console supports. For instance SVideo is better then Composite for SNES, PS1 and N64. Component is better then SVideo for the PS2.
RF-Composite-SVideo-Component-DVI/HDMI all look great! An HD CRT is a good compromise to handle all the resolutions. Newer LCDs, LEDs and Plasmas do offer a sharper pic in HDMI, but the CRT has a better display for Retro consoles.

Thanks CRTGAMER and Zing for your replies! I've decided that I do want the consoles to display in their original resolution with scanlines, so I'm going to opt for a SD CRT of the same series. I'm guessing this would look better overall (if only marginally) than up-scanning to 480p.
Since the Sega CDX only has native support for composite and RGB, I'm also going to use a CSY-2100 or CVS287 to convert the RGB signal to component rather than deal with modding it for S-video... while I'm at it, this gives me an excuse to get SCART cables for my SNES and Saturn as well to do the same thing!

Since the resulting signal outputs (supposedly) at 480i, it shouldn't really matter that it's connected to a non-HD TV rather than vice versa in terms of quality differences, correct? This also applies to component cables that I have for an oXbox: some games can't do 480p, which means they are going to be 480i... there would be no benefit to having a 480i signal through component on a HD CRT versus this SD one, correct?
In other words, I'm checking to see if a 480i signal from component is still preferable to have on a SD CRT (to preserve scanlines and resolution) rather than a HD one despite it being quite a huge jump from composite... or if it's 'special' now and more suited to a HD CRT to get the best results. I'm guessing the only possible "benefit" would be the upscanning... might do a better job with the component signal than a composite one is all (?) Thanks for all your help!
I am stoked!
