The difference between a 5 star rating and a 10.0/10 rating is that 10.0 allows for MUCH more fine score measurement. 10.0 means that the game is BETTER then 99% positive. Which is insane. Even the tiniest flaw should knock it down a percent. Many flaws have been addressed, but for some reason they just choose to ignore flaws for hyped up games. Right off the bat, many people are warning that MGS4 is not worth the price if you don't know the series head to toe to start with. I consider that a fucking HUGE flaw, and a violation of one of the most general rules of sequel design, not only in video games, but in movies and novels as well. When you create a game that cant stand on it's own two legs without using prior entries as crutches, you have failed at some point. Sorry. Go back to the fucking drawing board.RadarScope1 wrote:A little late on the take here but -
It's a matter of personal interpretation but count me in the camp that does not believe in a "perfect" score. I think this stems from the common phrase "perfect 10." I know 1UP and EGM have said many times they don't consider a 10 to be perfect - just that they think this particular game is "tops" for them, whatever that may be. I personally think the 1-10 scale is shit and think either a letter grade (which 1UP uses now) or stars are much better. No one ever gripes about a "perfect" five star movie review. Actually, the very best reviews have no scale of any kind. My favorite pro reviewers now are the guys who write the Opposable Thumbs blog at Ars Technica. I love their MGS4 review that was posted today because they took Kojima to task for a number of things despite some true greatness in there. I would be interested to see what you guys who have finished the game think of the Ars review. (I don't have a PS3.)
Thought I disagree with Moz about the meaning of 10, I totally agree that user reviews are much more accurate almost every time.
EDIT: Here's that review: http://arstechnica.com/reviews/games/me ... solid4.ars
This is kind of similar to why I hate most anime. The extreme reliance on consecutive order. I absolutely loved Cowboy Bebop because I was able to watch that show entirely out of order and still totally understand what was happening. That is brilliant design. There was still an element of chronological storytelling going on in minor ways that the die hard fans could appreciate, but it not only didn't harm my experience; I didn't even notice it.