Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
it's too bad the SNES has better games than both 
- Weekend_Warrior
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:48 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Genesis > Super Nintendo
But the Neo Geo would have been "King Shit" had third-party developers like EA and Capcom made games for it.
But the Neo Geo would have been "King Shit" had third-party developers like EA and Capcom made games for it.
"Welcome to the circus of values!"
Currently Playing: Crysis (360), Destiny demo (PS3), Roadblasters (MAME)
Currently Playing: Crysis (360), Destiny demo (PS3), Roadblasters (MAME)
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Did we really get into another SNES VS Genesis argument? Does it matter? They are all worth owning.
-
Valkyrie-Favor
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:27 pm
- Location: Skies over Midgard
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
IIRC the SNES has like a 3 mHz processor. That's pretty much the same as a ColecoVision. It had different specialized components for graphics and sounds though which made it look better (usually) and have more sampling abilities than the Genesis or TG16. That Mode 7 stuff is another one of the specialized features. The Genesis had a more limited sound chip that was awesome when used right and couldn't push out sprites quite as well but it had a much better processor that made it better for fast games like shmups.
You could argue that the Neo Geo has no power at all because you're just shoving in an entire arcade board as a cartridge. But the arcade boards were way more powerful than home consoles then.
So, I'm going to go play Mario World.
You could argue that the Neo Geo has no power at all because you're just shoving in an entire arcade board as a cartridge. But the arcade boards were way more powerful than home consoles then.
So, I'm going to go play Mario World.
Tsun tsun dere tsun dere tsun tsun~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UPDATED trade list
noiseredux wrote:Playing on your GBA/PSP you can be watching a movie/TV show/playing another RPG on your TV and then just look at the screen every once in a while
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Ummmm....Valkyrie-Favor wrote:You could argue that the Neo Geo has no power at all because you're just shoving in an entire arcade board as a cartridge. But the arcade boards were way more powerful than home consoles then.

Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
-
Valkyrie-Favor
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:27 pm
- Location: Skies over Midgard
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Guess that's not quite right. I was misinformed
Pretty sure I was right about the SNES and Genesis stuff though.
Tsun tsun dere tsun dere tsun tsun~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UPDATED trade list
noiseredux wrote:Playing on your GBA/PSP you can be watching a movie/TV show/playing another RPG on your TV and then just look at the screen every once in a while
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Valkyrie-Favor wrote:Guess that's not quite right. I was misinformedPretty sure I was right about the SNES and Genesis stuff though.
The main CPU in the SNES and Colecovision were both around 3.5Mhz, yes, but that doesn't mean they are pretty much the same overall. The processors would have been very different. It's just the speed that was similar.IIRC the SNES has like a 3 mHz processor. That's pretty much the same as a ColecoVision. It had different specialized components for graphics and sounds though which made it look better (usually) and have more sampling abilities than the Genesis or TG16. That Mode 7 stuff is another one of the specialized features. The Genesis had a more limited sound chip that was awesome when used right and couldn't push out sprites quite as well but it had a much better processor that made it better for fast games like shmups.
The SNES did have specializations in some areas, so you are correct there. I am not sure about the Genesis's sprite capabilities being inferior to the SNES. I kind of thought it was the other way around. I am not expert, though.

Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
The SNES had a 3.58 Mhz CPU but most games ran at 2-something Mhz. Some SNES games even had loading screens. It was not a zippy system. I played the Resident Evil game on the 3DS yesterday and up popped a screen saying "NOW LOADING". Something is definitely wrong when cartridge games need to have noticeable load time.
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
Maybe it had something to do with the extra capacity cart they used for Revelations?Redifer wrote: I played the Resident Evil game on the 3DS yesterday and up popped a screen saying "NOW LOADING". Something is definitely wrong when cartridge games need to have noticeable load time.
Re: Is the Neo Geo more powerful than the Super Nintendo?
I think I remember Street Fighter Alpha 2 having load times. I don't remember load screens, though.Redifer wrote:The SNES had a 3.58 Mhz CPU but most games ran at 2-something Mhz. Some SNES games even had loading screens. It was not a zippy system. I played the Resident Evil game on the 3DS yesterday and up popped a screen saying "NOW LOADING". Something is definitely wrong when cartridge games need to have noticeable load time.

Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857


