sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
- Nintendork666
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:52 am
- Location: Michigan, USA
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
I concur.
It's cool man, don't sweat it.
It's cool man, don't sweat it.
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X // MSI GAMING X TRIO GeForce RTX 3090 

Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
With the obvious exception of RPGs (I don't know why but I could never get in to Phantasy Star or anything like that), my own personal preference leans towards the Genesis for almost every genre. This makes me happy when I can get complete Genesis games for 5 bucks 
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
The SNES one has that tree/rock column/whatever in the background as an additional layer, in addition to having the capacity to display enough colors for it all to be a different palette than the foreground.PresidentLeever wrote:Who are 'they' and how would you know?Hobie-wan wrote:They squeezed them to be the same size for neatness.PresidentLeever wrote: The MD screenshot has obviously been squeezed horizontally![]()
"The point was the colors and the extra tree layer of graphics. Not eye roll worthy IMHO."
He didn't say anything of the sort, he said they're not the same. If the point is to show differences, then one should show all of them.
...also, what extra layer?
- samsonlonghair
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5188
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
- Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
I love the fact that Genesis games are so cheap. My Genesis collection just keeps growing and growing--all of it for pennies!
-
Not_a_sockpuppet
- 8-bit
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:56 am
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
Nintendo has a Disney-like following that eclipses the amount of people that know what the Megadrive can offer them. Their original price is mostly irrelevant now (see: 3DO), it's demand what increases the price.
There's also a quite ardent following for many SNES games that don't have a direct equivalent in the Megadrive, sure, Megadrive RPGs are very good but none have the followers Final Fantasy has.
There's also a quite ardent following for many SNES games that don't have a direct equivalent in the Megadrive, sure, Megadrive RPGs are very good but none have the followers Final Fantasy has.
- BoneSnapDeez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 20148
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:08 pm
- Location: Maine
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
I like both systems, but believe the SNES is superior in every possible way. If a game is on both systems, I will pay more for the SNES version.
I do like how I can sometimes find Genesis games CIB, but loose SNES carts always feel much nicer and sturdier than their Genesis counterparts.
At my local retro game store, the SNES games are meticulously lined up at eye-level. The Genesis games are on a very low shelf (almost on the floor), haphazardly tossed together, and covered in dust. The contrast is staggering.
I do like how I can sometimes find Genesis games CIB, but loose SNES carts always feel much nicer and sturdier than their Genesis counterparts.
At my local retro game store, the SNES games are meticulously lined up at eye-level. The Genesis games are on a very low shelf (almost on the floor), haphazardly tossed together, and covered in dust. The contrast is staggering.
- BurningDoom
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:14 am
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
+1BoneSnapDeez wrote:I like both systems, but believe the SNES is superior in every possible way. If a game is on both systems, I will pay more for the SNES version.
There are exceptions, but for the most part, the SNES versions usually have better graphics and sound.
Game Trade/Want List:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=28206
Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=28206
Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
^
+1 for me as well.
However.... being a collector, I feel the need to own both versions usually. But I only ever want to actually "play" the SNES version. LOL.
What can I say? I'm a fan boy from waaaaaaay before that term even existed on the interwebs.
(oh yeah, with the exception of Aladdin, and a few others....)
+1 for me as well.
However.... being a collector, I feel the need to own both versions usually. But I only ever want to actually "play" the SNES version. LOL.
What can I say? I'm a fan boy from waaaaaaay before that term even existed on the interwebs.
(oh yeah, with the exception of Aladdin, and a few others....)
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
This is a pretty bold statement. SNES hardware is generally better (although when it comes to audio it's subjective, one can prefer the way Genesis music sounds), what should really matter is the game libraries. Which is nothing but a matter of taste. Like with any console argument, there is no "better" console.BoneSnapDeez wrote:I like both systems, but believe the SNES is superior in every possible way. If a game is on both systems, I will pay more for the SNES version.
- dunpeal2064
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:55 pm
- Location: Central Valley, California
- Contact:
Re: sega games vs snes games. snes still more expensive
I dunno, there are some consoles that I think completely outdid their competition.
However, in the case of SNES vs GEN, I don't think either console is better. They both have a wide range of games from each genre (e.g. SNES had a better rpg selection, and GEN had a better shmup selection, but they both had good rpgs and shmups)
However, in the case of SNES vs GEN, I don't think either console is better. They both have a wide range of games from each genre (e.g. SNES had a better rpg selection, and GEN had a better shmup selection, but they both had good rpgs and shmups)