Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
User avatar
Yancakes
64-bit
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:04 am
Location: Victoria, BC

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by Yancakes »

Oh lord finally. I'm glad that, actually, no one has EVER gotten it right before. I've never seen a timeline in this shape :D
3DSStrider
64-bit
Posts: 499
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:53 am
Location: South Carolina, USA

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by 3DSStrider »

alienjesus wrote:
Opa Opa wrote:The CDi games aren't on the timeline?
Image
Where do Zelda's Adventure and the Game and Watch Zelda fit into this?
Insert clever quote here.
My Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/3DSStrider
Let's Play Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuNEFO ... qkaLOHc2nQ
User avatar
Hobie-wan
Next-Gen
Posts: 21705
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
Contact:

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by Hobie-wan »

Where the fuck is Nintendo Cereal System Zelda in this bullshit?

Image
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8875
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by alienjesus »

MrPopo wrote:This chart is massive fail for putting the Oracle games in the lowest tier of real Zelda games.
I have to agree. I find it odd that they rate phantom hourglass as good, and some of those other ones as OK. Phantom hourglass is easily one of the most 'OK' zeldas there is.

OPINIONS HO!
Hobie-wan wrote:Where the fuck is Nintendo Cereal System Zelda in this bullshit?

Image
It's on the one I posted. :)
Image
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by noiseredux »

3DSStrider wrote: Where do Zelda's Adventure and the Game and Watch Zelda fit into this?
I'm probably the one person who's always been annoyed at Nintendo's ignoring the CD-i games. Sure they are pretty bad games. Sure they were developed by someone else. BUT Nintendo did grant that license, so sweeping them under the rug is annoying to me.
Image
Opa Opa

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by Opa Opa »

noiseredux wrote:I'm probably the one person who's always been annoyed at Nintendo's ignoring the CD-i games. Sure they are pretty bad games. Sure they were developed by someone else. BUT Nintendo did grant that license, so sweeping them under the rug is annoying to me.
^This.

And The Minish Cap was developed by Capcom and it's considered canon? You might as well include the CDi games. They do exist and they are Zelda games after all; I don't care if they're "bad" games or not.
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8875
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by alienjesus »

Opa Opa wrote:
noiseredux wrote:I'm probably the one person who's always been annoyed at Nintendo's ignoring the CD-i games. Sure they are pretty bad games. Sure they were developed by someone else. BUT Nintendo did grant that license, so sweeping them under the rug is annoying to me.
^This.

And The Minish Cap was developed by Capcom and it's considered canon? You might as well include the CDi games. They do exist and they are Zelda games after all; I don't care if they're "bad" games or not.
TBF, Nintendo probably was probably quite majorly involved in minish cap and oracles even if capcom developed it. They weren't involved at all in the development of the CDi games. Besides which, I'm not sure they would fit anywhere in series canon, they dont really follow the story of the others.
Image
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by samsonlonghair »

The whole timeline issue is kind of silly to me.
The games are called Legend of Zelda. Consider the word Legend for a moment. Where is it written that Legends have to maintain a consistent timeline?
Consider that the legend of Iphigenia happens just before Agamemnon leaves for the Trojan War, and the legend of Electra happens after Agamemnon returns home from the Trojan War. This does not mean that the two stories need to be entirely consistent, nor do they need to be consistent with the Illiad. Each story stands on its own without the need for a consistent timeline.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by noiseredux »

samsonlonghair wrote:The whole timeline issue is kind of silly to me.
The games are called Legend of Zelda. Consider the word Legend for a moment. Where is it written that Legends have to maintain a consistent timeline?
Consider that the legend of Iphigenia happens just before Agamemnon leaves for the Trojan War, and the legend of Electra happens after Agamemnon returns home from the Trojan War. This does not mean that the two stories need to be entirely consistent, nor do they need to be consistent with the Illiad. Each story stands on its own without the need for a consistent timeline.
in all seriousness, I don't really care about timelines or whatever for any games. I just want to enjoy each game.
Image
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: Nintendo releases Official Zelda Timeline

Post by samsonlonghair »

Exactly. Enjoy each game on its own merits; forget about trying to shoehorn the games into a collective canon.
Post Reply