This reminded me of how Canada used to measure TV size differently. In the USA, the size is the viewable area. In Canada, and I assume the UK (which is probably where Canada got the idea), the size is the actual front of the tube, including the part under the bezel. So you ended up with a 27" TV being called a 28" or 29" in Canada.retrosportsgamer wrote:I think you mean 24" but yeah, I have this set and it's a nice size for retrogaming.Bikeage wrote:I'm regretting not getting a 25" Trinitron at Goodwill a few months ago. It was flatscreen and had component and S-video, but $60, and between space issues and not needing one I decided to pass and show up early four days later on half off day.... and of course it was gone.
Any recommendations for an all around gaming tv
Re: Any recommendations for an all around gaming tv
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
Re: Any recommendations for an all around gaming tv
This is actually a coin-flip situation since the XBR200 was a very high quality set. The features are pretty much the same on the FV300, despite the XBR being made three years earlier.dogman91 wrote:Quick question: what's better in terms of picture quality (not necessarily features); a 1998 standard definition XBR200 or a 2002 FV300?
I'd get whichever one was used less, if that is possible to know. Otherwise, get whichever one appears to have been used less.
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay