DinnerX wrote:Xeogred wrote:Definitely didn't look bad, but yeah.
I wonder how Rayman 2 PC measures up to the Dreamcast version though? I'd imagine they might be neck and neck, best resolutions on both and all (and hopefully you can play 2 on the PC with a controller?), it's kind of tempting...
The PC version is the same as the N64 version, but with high resolutions.
I rate the PC version as inferior to the DC and N64 versions because you have to have a PC gamepad to really have any fun with it, and you have to go through the bother of setting it up. On the consoles, you just stick the game in and it works.
s1mplehumar wrote:retromangia wrote:Hey Boring supreez,
you say "Fixed some stuff, added some new versions in. I HATE Rayman 2 on PS2. They changed a bunch of stuff, all for the worse"..
can you please elaborate on that? right now the PS2 sounds like the best version to me.
Poopy frame rate on the PS2 version, which is sort of puzzling, they jacked up the music if I remember correctly. They also
enhanced some of the scenery, imo for the worse. The DC version is far superior.
Yes, these are the reasons I don't like it on PS2. Much worse framerate, despite the fact that the PS2 is more powerful than an N64 or DC, the scenery and textures are frequently changed for no apparent reason (to the point that some parts of levels that used to be outdoors are now indoors), the game prompts the player to save
way too often, saving and loading seems to take more time than before, and they added voices in. That wouldn't be a problem except that one has to turn them off in the options menu every time he plays; it defaults back to voices on every time the game is started.