Revised Wii system

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by isiolia »

Never trust ANYTHING an audiophile says.
I don't particularly. The article does, however, have a page full of measurements taken that illustrate that the PSX is not on par with a high end CD player.
This keeps coming up, audiophiles are fooled by the extra jacks putting out the bad info.
Audiophiles like the early model PSXs because the DAC is a separate chip. Plenty of them are adding/modding plugs on the 1000 and 5000 series models. Later models have the DAC incorporated into another chip.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by noiseredux »

yeah I had a launch PS1 and kept it hooked up to my awesome stereo system back then.
Image
User avatar
D.D.D.
Next-Gen
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:33 am
Location: of the Estrecho de Gibraltar is where now?
Contact:

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by D.D.D. »

ZeroAX wrote:Since the PS3 wasn't powerful enough to emulator the PS2 I doubt the Wii U will be able to emulate the gamecube....then again it will be backwards compatible with the wii, so same thing? :lol:
Well that could be a good thing then. So since the GC games will be VC and the Wii is a souped up Gamecube, hopefully it will just be able to run off the Wii chips and still be 100% backwards compatible so that the only thing keeping GC games off of VC would be licensing issues as there shouldn't be a need to write/customize an emulator for each GC game... hopefully. :roll:
 (FC, AVFC, NES, SFC x2, SNES, N64, GC x2, Wii x2)*(G&W x7, GB, GBpocket, GBASP, DS-L x2)
(GEN, SS x3, DC x3)*(PCE-Duo)*(Xbox:500GB)*(NGCDZ, NGPC)*(PS1, PStwo, PS3:160GB, PSP.3K)
User avatar
flamepanther
Next-Gen
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:40 pm

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by flamepanther »

isiolia wrote:
Never trust ANYTHING an audiophile says.
I don't particularly. The article does, however, have a page full of measurements taken that illustrate that the PSX is not on par with a high end CD player.
This keeps coming up, audiophiles are fooled by the extra jacks putting out the bad info.
Audiophiles like the early model PSXs because the DAC is a separate chip. Plenty of them are adding/modding plugs on the 1000 and 5000 series models. Later models have the DAC incorporated into another chip.
Well, the other thing is that specific DAC chip was supposedly the same as one that was used in some really nice sound systems. Of course, that doesn't mean it's used the same way in the PS1.

Some audiophiles do know what they're talking about--especially a few I know that have worked in the recording business. They can usually provide the science behind their opinions. Others tend to be fooled by placebo effect. Then there are the people with lousy ears who assume anyone with more accute hearing is a liar. They're just as bad.
Image
User avatar
Jamisonia
128-bit
Posts: 955
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:21 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by Jamisonia »

I would assume the one with a separate DAC chip is easier to Digital Audio mod then.
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by isiolia »

Jamisonia wrote:I would assume the one with a separate DAC chip is easier to Digital Audio mod then.
Most aren't doing digital audio mods AFAIK, so much as directly wiring the DAC to the RCA outs. Again, most of the fuss is due to that particular chip. There's probably little left un-tampered with in the setup though. I linked to it already, but diy audio's thread on the subject is currently around 260 pages. Got people adding optical out, some trying to do optical in, changing up power, putting the whole mess in custom enclosures...

I'd be half-inclined to think that it's also just a very common, cheap device for people who like to mod that kind of gear to mess with. While I do care about audio to an extent, and don't immediately discount -everything- said by the enthusiast community...the fact that my 1001 sits unmolested, gathering dust probably says enough about how much I personally buy into the hype :roll:
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by BoringSupreez »

That new GCN-less Wii is coming to the US this November. And it's not going to cost any less. Boooo....
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
Inazuma
Next-Gen
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by Inazuma »

BoringSupreez wrote:That new GCN-less Wii is coming to the US this November. And it's not going to cost any less. Boooo....
Reminds me of when Nintendo removed the component out on the Gamecube late in its life. Now whenever we buy a used Wii, we have to make sure it has Gamecube controller ports.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Revised Wii system

Post by BoringSupreez »

Inazuma wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:That new GCN-less Wii is coming to the US this November. And it's not going to cost any less. Boooo....
Reminds me of when Nintendo removed the component out on the Gamecube late in its life. Now whenever we buy a used Wii, we have to make sure it has Gamecube controller ports.
At least they didn't do this until late in the Wii's lifespan. There won't be nearly as many GCN-less Wii's outs there as the regular ones. I doubt that the Wii is going to be around for more than another year or so.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Post Reply